My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN CHARTER 2019-03-29 (2018-2020) - Public Hearing
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
2018
>
Minutes
>
MIN CHARTER 2019-03-29 (2018-2020) - Public Hearing
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2019 7:50:34 AM
Creation date
4/29/2019 1:21:43 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Hawai`i County Charter Commission — Public Hearing March 29, 2019 <br />KEONI FOX: <br />underground resources. And so, I think it is appropriate that the County support <br />these volunteers and at least the managers that spend a lot of time planning and <br />organizing the work that is being done by the volunteers. In the Cave <br />Conservancy all our expenses... none of our expenses are paid for. Everything is <br />out of pocket and that is the way that we have been operating for the last 20 years. <br />And finally on the question of CA -8, I made a mistake on my form. I oppose CA - <br />8. I do support that the two-year terms and especially because the two-year terms <br />make the Council members more responsive to the voters. Thank you. <br />CHR. ADAMS: Thank you very much. Mr. Foy. <br />MR. FOX: Good afternoon my name is Keoni Fox. <br />CHR. ADAMS: Fox. <br />Proposal No. CA -9 and CA -18, commenting. <br />MR. FOX: F.O.X. Fox, yes. I am involved with a couple different non -profits. I <br />sit on the boards and I have been involved with the PONC nomination process as <br />well as with the stewardship process. I am actually here today to speak in my <br />individual capacity. <br />The first item is regarding CA -9. I will just keep my comments brief. I have <br />been trying to follow the different proposed changes. There have been many so it <br />is a little difficult to see what is the latest, but my first comment regarding CA -9, I <br />do support dedicating a staff, using the 2% monies for the program. The latest <br />language it is my understanding that it doesn't single out one full-time staff <br />member, it just says staff in general and I think it is really important to say that <br />there is one person that is going to carry that responsibility and that they are <br />dedicated to the program so that you know, we don't lose that... the benefits that <br />that one position can offer. And I think that you know, although there has been a <br />lot of challenges and there have been some comments about how the program can <br />be improved, it is really important to think about the potential of this program and <br />really what it can do and it is still relatively new. I still think it has room to grow <br />and I think that is kind of where we are all at today and that is what we all want to <br />do. We all want to see it succeed. <br />My second comment is about CA -18. I definitely support the transfer of the <br />program from Parks over to Finance. I think that they can do a good job running <br />this and I do have some concerns about some of the proposed language that <br />allowed for development of restroom facilities and so forth. It is important to <br />remember that you know, all of these lands that we are protecting, they are not <br />typical parks or what we would think of like a beach park. A lot of these sites <br />have very sensitive cultural and natural resources so something like you know a <br />new trail or a bathroom facility just might not be appropriate. You know I realize <br />Page 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.