My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN CHARTER 2019-04-01 (2018-2020) - Public Hearing
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
2018
>
Minutes
>
MIN CHARTER 2019-04-01 (2018-2020) - Public Hearing
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2019 7:51:39 AM
Creation date
4/29/2019 1:22:23 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Hawai`i County Charter Commission — Public Hearing April 1, 2019 <br />certainly want to see it. And we can have a look to see how this fund could be <br />managed going forward. <br />I think I will leave it at that. Thank you. <br />CHR. ADAMS: Thank you. Ann Kobsa, if you could please come forward. <br />Great. Go ahead sir. <br />DIGA KERN: Proposal No. CA -9 and CA -18 in support. <br />MR KERN: My name is Diga Kern and I am going to address the PONC fund in <br />general so maybe just some guiding thoughts about that and then specifically <br />about CA -9 and CA -18. <br />For the past 25 years I have worked in regenerative agriculture and alternative <br />children's education ecosystem restoration in Puna. And I voted for the original <br />PONC proposal in 2006 and in 2010, and in 2012. I serve my local community <br />(inaudible) as a Board member and I volunteer time regularly caring for the <br />forests and coastal lands of our region. So regarding the PONC program, I really <br />maintain that the strongest reason for maintaining the original spirit of the <br />program is the 63% of voters again and again over the course of eight years <br />basically committed ourselves to these protections. Apparently Big Island voters <br />feel strongly that the natural beauty of our island should be protected and are <br />willing to commit a full two percent of our property taxes toward this cause, so I <br />ask that you seriously and honestly honor this commitment. Also in terms of <br />amendments that may be produced in the coming months, so what is that spirit? <br />Well, three elements I would say or attributes, one, that the lands are held in <br />perpetuity, this is the only way that we citizens can meaningfully look our <br />children in the eyes and say we are protecting the land for use by future <br />generations, and this is the only way that we will continue to seek matching funds <br />for the purchase of these properties, which I see as a powerful mechanism in <br />which tax dollars can be used as leverage for conservation action. <br />Second, that no less than two percent of property taxes be maintained as a <br />baseline funding amount for the program, and three, that the fund cannot be <br />accessed for any use other than expenses directly related to purchase and <br />maintenance of targeted lands. <br />So I ask that you not allow any proposed amendments which violate this spirit, to <br />advance beyond a first reading of this body. And regarding this... oh, <br />additionally, you are currently considering two amendments which strengthen and <br />enhance this spirit of the program. So CA -18, I think is really excellent. It will <br />lubricate the ability of public and NGO's (Non -Governmental Organizations) to <br />get boots on the ground caring for PONC acquisitions. I live in an area where <br />partnerships among a half dozen community 501(c)(3)'s have managed volunteer <br />networks doing invasive species control and restoration work in the forest <br />Page 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.