Laserfiche WebLink
Hawai`i County Charter Commission — Public Hearing April 3, 2019 <br />CHR. ADAMS: Thank you sir. I would ask that Anne Harvey please come to the <br />table. Ms. Dursin. <br />SUSAN DURSIN: Proposal No. CA -8, CA -9, CA -18, and CA -27, commenting. <br />MS. DURSIN: Hi. <br />CHR. ADAMS: You need to speak... there we go. <br />MS. DURSIN: I have spoken to you several times before, but I am here because <br />it seems to me that finally after all the iterations of the Communications relating <br />to PONC, that we are at a point where the proposals do seem to deal with the real <br />problems that face PONC. There are two major challenges I believe, and it has <br />become pretty apparent that purchase of properties has been painfully slow and <br />that government officials and members of the public wonder why so much money <br />is sitting there unused, and then of course the second problem has been that the <br />non -profits have quite a bit of problem getting the grant funding in order to fulfill <br />their maintenance requirements. So, it seems to me that CA -9, this latest form <br />that was introduced by Commissioner Galimba, would address both problems that <br />paying for a full-time staff person in the Department of Finance to work only on <br />the 2% Land Fund would allow focus on those problems that are so complex <br />about acquiring the properties and also seeking the outside funding. It would also <br />allow that staff person to help the non -profits work their way through the maze of <br />paper that they have to complete to get the funding at all. <br />Then also that the changes to the maintenance fund that would be CA -18, as <br />introduced by Commissioner Rice, include one very important item. That the <br />Department of Finance administer the fund. It has not been a good situation to <br />have Parks and Rec (Recreation) doing it because they have so many other duties. <br />With a second employee in the Department of Finance to administer the fund, one <br />that would be paid for by the fund and deal solely with the fund, the non-profit <br />should be able to receive and distribute their funding more effectively. So, CA -18 <br />in its presently proposed form, allows the construction of small structures and <br />trails, toilets, and it would certainly be an improvement and it is also crucial to <br />making sure that the coordination and consistency of programs go forward when <br />you can divert some funding to those groups. Even to paying individuals. So I <br />want to thank you for your patience in dealing with these issues. I... just a word <br />or two about CA -27, which would call for easement to be a priority. To seek <br />easement wherever possible. As I understand it, it really is not necessary. That it <br />already exists and many times will not solve the problems that are there. <br />I want to just say one more thing about something that isn't on this list, but it has <br />come to my attention that you talked about a special election instead of pushing <br />this off to 2020. And I know the time frame has been of interest to you because it <br />turned out there was such a long time between the Council's dealing with this and <br />Page 6 <br />