Communication No. 2019-09- KCDP Amendments PD Review

Home

Communication No. 2019-09 requirements, suggest a work plan to coordinate the permit requirements, and follow through with various agencies to avoid delays. c) Increased Range of Permitted Uses and De nsities. As an incentive, the TODs substantially increase the permitted uses and densities over the existing zoning. In partial return for this additional density, the master plan will need to incorporate a minimum level of affordable housing (discussed further in the Section 4.5 Housing), provide a variety of open spaces within the TOD, and preserve open space around the TOD, in perpetuity. d) Prioritized Essential Infrastructure. Government capital improvements programs will may give priority to servicing the TODs, particularly with regard to roads, water, and sewer (discussed further in Section 4.6 Public Facilities, Infrastructure and Services). Where regional drainage systems are appropriate, the County will may coordinate such improvements. e) Public Fin ancing of Infrastructure. In recognition of the regional benefits of major roads and transit stations, these types of improvements within TODs shall should be funded with general revenue funding sources. f) Concurrency Requirements. The TOD Village Master P lan will control the provision of infrastructure relative to build out. Therefore, the countywide concurrency requirements will be met for projects within TODs. g) Vested Rights. A TOD Village Master Plan, based on the Village Design Guidelines (Attachment B), will be built out over a number of years. Investors require certainty; in return, the community and government expect performance on promises. The reciprocal commitments set forth in the master plan would be secured by a development agreement that wi ll include a Phasing Plan. The agreement will specify the developers commitment to provide certain public facilities. In return, government will provide a commitment to complete certain public infrastructure by a certain date. h) Redevelopment Authority. I n order to spur the redevelopment of Kailua Village as a TOD, redevelopment can be stimulated and coordinated by either an expanded business improvement district or the establishment of a redevelopment authority. 2. To encourage village - style development outs ide of TODs within the Urban Area: a) Already Zoned. For undeveloped areas already zoned residential, commercial, or industrial, the intent is to encourage a more creative mix of uses and density, by clustering to create open spaces and pedestrian - oriented s treetscapes. The Kona CDP creates an overlay zone for these areas to allow an administrative review of a master plan consistent with Village Design Guidelines. b) Need Rezoning. For areas zoned agricultural within the Kona Urban Area (UA), a new type of Pro ject District (as defined in the Chapter 25 Zoning Code) is should be created called the Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND). Although rezoning through a legislative process is required, the advantages would be similar to a TOD: design flexibility , concurrent environm ental reviews and S tate Land Use Boundary Amendments, Design Center services, increased range of permitted uses and density, concurrency waivers, development agreement options to negotiate public improvements commitments and other term s. 19