Laserfiche WebLink
the rest, and has put forth the two million this year, fiscal year 2019, and then four million for the <br /> following. It's a pretty straight forward bill; there's no other information other than, that's it. It's <br /> for the demolition and removal of structures at Uncle Billy's. It has gone through the WTL <br /> Committee; Water, Transportation, Land Committee, and they've recommended passing it and <br /> the report from the Senators was adopted. Support for this, DLNR supports this. They're looking <br /> to move forward,just as we are here at the County, and they stated it's the only viable solution to <br /> the situation at this time regarding Uncle Billy's, so, so that's good. And then of course the <br /> County Mayor's Office also supports due to health and safety issues; they want to move forward <br /> on getting rid of that dilapidated structure. <br /> House Bill 1910. This one directs the State Office of Planning to conduct an infrastructure study <br /> of Banyan Drive. Now, this is going to include the condition of the infrastructure, for curb <br /> repairs, improvements, alterations to all the structures there on Banyan Drive, determine the <br /> barriers to timely redevelopment. That's a pretty broad statement. And then they've, they are <br /> asking to make recommendations regarding activities to reducing those barriers. So they're really <br /> putting a lot on Office of Planning to come up with a kind of an infrastructure study. Now, this <br /> kind of goes hand-in-hand with the studies that were done on the existing structures by DLNR <br /> previously, but this would include all infrastructure. DLNR has concerns; they believe it's not in <br /> the best interest to expend limited funds. They kind of go on to say since 2014 they've spent over <br /> half a million dollars from the, was it the, Special Land and Development Fund on consultant <br /> services dedicated to Banyan Drive. So they kind of feel that this is not really in the best interest <br /> for the BDHRA. OP just has concerns, really, in that they have not been part of this conversation <br /> or don't feel that they're a part of this conversation and that they are probably not the agency to <br /> take something on like this. The other thing to note is DLNR, and this is gonna come up again, is <br /> DLNR feels that this bill's not going to cover the privately owned infrastructure or the County- <br /> owned infrastructure. So, it would be only a part of the story if this were to pass. That the study <br /> OP would conduct would be on the State's kind of interest only and the County would have to <br /> kind of deal with the rest of it on our own. The Mayor's Office supports this because they <br /> believe the funds are needed to get the Environmental Assessment done. And then we did get a <br /> ILWU Local 142 supported that mainly, because of the construction and the availability of work <br /> for them at that, if this were to pass. It's a pretty general statement; they'd said it would <br /> hopefully lead to the economic well-being of Banyan Drive. That's understandable. <br /> As far as [H.B.] 910 is concerned, finance has recommended the measure be passed un-amended <br /> and it's moving forward. <br /> GADDIS: Sorry could you repeat that last <br /> ROY: That the finance, so FIN has recommended the measure be passed as un-amended. <br /> CANNON-EGER: And it's moving forward? <br /> ROY: Yeah, and so they're moving forward. This was as of like the 22nd I got, yeah so, yeah, as <br /> of a couple days ago this is the last I've seen in the Leg website as far as what's going on. <br /> Alright, State Bill number 914. This one requires DLNR to allocate ten percent of the revenues <br /> from those leased properties to the BDHRA. It appropriates funds to the BDHRA for conducting <br /> Page 3 of 15 <br /> Banyan Drive Hawaii Redevelopment Agency <br /> February 27,2019 Minutes <br />