My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2019-02-27 BDHRA Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Banyan Drive HRA
>
Minutes
>
2019
>
2019-02-27 BDHRA Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/3/2019 11:05:39 AM
Creation date
5/3/2019 11:05:26 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Notice DLNR referred this matter to us. Gordon, could you address? Because there's a process, <br /> right, that this is going through? Are you able to; I figure you're here so <br /> HEIT: Okay so, thank you. The process is again, working with this agency on developing a <br /> master plan and proceeding with it. As you mentioned earlier with the Uncle Billy's property, <br /> we're working with Tower Development. They're the ones that, the only ones that submitted a <br /> request for interest so we're in discussion with them on the next step on how to proceed with <br /> that, which more likely will be a request for proposal to put out for the development of the <br /> property which would include demolition and restructure. With regards <br /> GADDIS: Do you have an approximate timeline for RFPs from their side? <br /> HEIT: No. Simple answer. I'm afraid I don't. With regards with the other properties, there's two <br /> other significant properties that are on a month-to-month revocable permit. The former Country <br /> Club property which is, actually that was recently canceled and a new RP has been issued under, <br /> I believe it's Oceanside 121 Partners, and Reed's Bay Resort Hotel which is Mr. Inouye's <br /> property. Mr. Inouye has presented us a proposal to make improvements to the property, <br /> requesting a long-term lease. The process for that as it currently stands is to put the property out <br /> for bid at public auction with the idea that improvements will be made to the property. So, we're <br /> kind of in a holding pattern right now because we want to make sure that where we do proceed <br /> with it is in conjunction with the future planning and development of the entire peninsula, which <br /> would be the involvement of this agency. So pretty much in a nutshell, that's where we are right <br /> now. <br /> DELIMA: Any questions? Mr. Yee you want to make any comment? <br /> YEE: I had said this before in a previous meeting and so I'm kind of reiterating. We're kind of <br /> caught in a circular loop, I feel, with DLNR in terms of we want an EIS. You know, for us to <br /> proceed as the BDHRA to have authority to do some work there, we need an EIS. We need <br /> money to do the EIS so then we propose ways through legislation for money from the State for <br /> the EIS and DLNR will come out against them saying we don't want to. Yet then Mr. Heit sits <br /> here and says, you know, we want to go through the BDHRA to kind of do this work. So we're <br /> caught in this circular loop. At some point I think we need to ask like if you know, does DLNR <br /> agree with doing the EIS in the next step and how are we going to fund that then? I mean, we <br /> keep putting forth ideas how to do that and if these aren't the right ideas the question has to go to <br /> DLNR; okay, what is, what is something that they're willing to do, then to get it forward. There <br /> seems to be at this point like Brian, you and I have said, we're getting a little tired banging our <br /> heads against the wall on this issue and so if there's an offer that DLNR can offer in terms of <br /> how we can move forward with an EIS, to share that responsibility, then we'd love to hear it. But <br /> we keep throwing things out, we have legislators throwing out different ideas and we just keep <br /> getting no. You know, in the end, whether or not we get one of the bills to pass and then is forced <br /> upon DLNR, we'll see, but again if neither of them pass I kind of wonder what's our next step <br /> again. So I don't feel like we're on any clearer path than we were a year ago, two years ago, at <br /> this point still. <br /> Page 8 of 15 <br /> Banyan Drive Hawaii Redevelopment Agency <br /> February 27,2019 Minutes <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.