My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2019-03-27 BDHRA Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Banyan Drive HRA
>
Minutes
>
2019
>
2019-03-27 BDHRA Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/3/2019 11:09:27 AM
Creation date
5/3/2019 11:09:26 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />designated. That particular parcel of land is not even privately held. Once again, thank you for <br />your effort and thank you for my three minutes. Aloha. <br /> <br />CANNON-EGER: Mr. Chair? <br /> <br />GADDIS: Yeah, go ahead. <br /> <br />CANNON-EGER: Mr. Bockrath, if you would please, I have a question for you regarding your <br />question number two. <br /> <br />BOCKRATH: Yes. <br /> <br />CANNON-EGER: The voted, adopted, and approved scenario that I have in my hand is scenario <br />two. <br /> <br />BOCKRATH: That would be my mistake. I wasn’t sure which scenario it was, but in either <br />case, they’re pretty much the same when it comes to the private held properties. <br /> <br />CANNON-EGER: Thank you very much. <br /> <br />BOCKRATH: Thank you. <br /> <br />GADDIS: Before we move on, anyone, does Planning want to comment on his question, or can <br />you guys add any feedback because I don’t have anything from our perspective on that. <br /> <br />YEE: Michael Yee, Planning Department. As for number one, the question regarding how <br />should they be treated comparatively to other developers. You know I don’t have a quick answer <br />to that except to say, you know, we treat everybody the same for the most part so I’m not sure <br />what, what’s being eluded there. If, so I’m not sure exactly in detail what the question was. I will <br />say on question two regarding the conceptual plan, I, my comment would be I think there was <br />every intention that that scenario that was selected was meant to take, was the conceptual plan to <br />be able to go to an EIS, and so that—where you devolve further alternatives. So the idea, I think, <br />of wanting to solidify what was really a conceptual plan would be a little difficult. I don’t think <br />that was the intention of it; was a, was a starting point for further discussion. So I’d want to <br />refrain from saying, “hey this, this plan was adopted in 2016 and we should follow it.” So just a <br />little precaution there. <br /> <br />GADDIS: So is there any feedback we can give him at the moment as far as things he can do to <br />jumpstart his process or, you know, speed things up for himself? Outside of BDHRA? <br /> <br />YEE: Well, so just like any other landowner, if he has an application wants to make he just <br />comes into Planning and, and talks to us and submits for whatever he’s interested in. <br /> <br />GADDIS: Go ahead Brian. <br /> <br /> <br />Page 2 of 9 <br />Banyan Drive Hawaiʽi Redevelopment Agency <br />March 27, 2019 Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.