My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2019-05-08 Letter to Magdalene Phillips re financial future of Puna, Bill 108
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Office of the Mayor Documents
>
2016-2020
>
Correspondence
>
2019
>
05-2019
>
2019-05-08 Letter to Magdalene Phillips re financial future of Puna, Bill 108
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2019 9:24:09 AM
Creation date
5/8/2019 9:21:22 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Rodillas, Martha <br />From:Hart <hamofhawaii@gmail.com> <br />Sent:Tuesday, May 07, 2019 7:53 AM <br />To:Kim, Harry <br />Subject:The Financial Future of Puna, especially Pahoa <br />Aloha: <br />My name is Magdalene Phillips. I would like to draw your attention to sad factors that will continue to have a <br />negative effect on the people of Puna and their pocket books. <br />Mayor Kim recently stated that of the approximately 500 homes lost to the lava in Kapoho, about 250 of them <br />were vacation rentals. If we assume that theses homes had about 30 different groups of guests per year, that would <br />total 7,500 couples, families, or groups of friends. If these groups only ate once at a Pahoa restaurant during their <br />stay and spent $60 for their meal, and spent a further $60 on groceries or souvenirs, that is a loss of $900,000 a <br />year for Pahoa restaurant and store owners. <br />A cleaning fee of $100 per group of guests, represents $750,000 of income lost by Puna resident cleaners. Add to <br />that yard work at $50 a month and repairs at $150 a year per home. That represents a total of $187,500 lost to <br />Puna gardeners and handymen or women. <br />All in all, that comes to $1,837,500 of yearly income lost to Puna residents, which I believe is a conservative <br />estimate. <br />So, you are wondering if plans are in place to allow owners of these rentals to re-establish a rental in a different <br />part of Puna. NOT SO! Bill108 was passed conveniently right after the eruption by our County Council, making <br />all vacation rentals in Puna non-conforming, and making no special allowances for rentals lost to lava. I agree <br />with Susan Barraackman’s letter to the editor May 3rd, which states: The people who think the operators of <br />AirBnB rentals are just a bunch of speculators looking to buy up homes to host guests and price the poor out of <br />the neighborhood are victims of propaganda. <br />Puna vacation rentals are desirable, because many couples and especially families with children, who can hardly <br />afford to pay hotel prices, prefer to stay in a home in a quiet area, <br />instead of putting up with the hustle and bustle, noise, and high prices of resort area stores and restaurants. Puna <br />has NO resort areas. There are many vacant homes for residents to rent. <br />We need to be able to designate all oceanfront and near ocean areas with homes in Puna, as well as areas <br />surrounding parks and beaches as tourist destinations, to take away the non- conforming label from our vacation <br />rentals. Otherwise, the financial future of Puna will be bleak! <br />Mahalo for listening, Magdalene Phillips <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.