Laserfiche WebLink
Hawai`i County Charter Commission -10 April 25, 2019 <br />really look at that seriously but that is my feeling. In any case once again thank <br />you for all of your time and all your work. It is not easy. <br />CHR. ADAMS: Thank you. Is there... are there any other testifiers in Kona? <br />MS. FORD: Yes Sir, there is. <br />CHR. ADAMS: Ms. Ford are you the only other testifier? <br />MS. FORD: Yes Sir. <br />CHR. ADAMS: Alright. Please go ahead Ms. Ford. <br />BRENDA FORD: Proposal No. CA -18 and CA -31 in support, Comm. No. 46 and Proposal No. <br />CA -27 in opposition. <br />MS. FORD: Thank you. My name is Brenda Ford and I am one of the co-authors <br />of the PONC and the Maintenance Fund associated with it. I would like to testify <br />on Communication No. 46, the calling of the special election for the Charter <br />Commission. I oppose this on the basis that it is a waste of County funds. You <br />have to do a special election. It could be done by mail in ballots but there is still a <br />lot of money wasted because those could still be sent out during a general <br />election. Rather than spend a couple of hundred thousand dollars doing a special <br />election, I would suggest that you use that money to put in an explanation of pro <br />and con explanation of each Charter amendment for the public when they get their <br />package mailed to them during the general election or they can pick it up from an <br />office or they can get it online. Two hundred thousand would be more than <br />enough. If you guys want to write the pros and the cons that is fine. If you don't <br />have anybody that wants to write the pro or the con, those of us in the public <br />would be glad to pick up the slack. So the things that we support, we would <br />rather write the pro statement rather than have somebody who is potentially <br />opposed to it write something strange. So I would urge you not to waste that <br />money but use it for a pro/con explanation to go as an insert into the ballots. <br />On CA -18, I support this. I am saddened to see that somehow it has gone back to <br />the original. We need to help these stewardship groups as much as we possibly <br />can. It is one of the things that we have learned over the years and I support it and <br />I hope you can change it back to the way we had it originally that we can pay <br />them. Our purpose is to make the PONC stronger and our stewardship grow <br />stronger and incent them to go out and take care of our land. The County cannot <br />and will not do it and it was never intended to do it. <br />On CA -27, regarding the forcing us to use easements. It is unnecessary. We can <br />use the easements now. We have always been able to use easements. You are <br />making a ballot longer than necessary at additional cost. Wasted time for <br />everybody. So I support 18, I oppose 27, I support CA -31. CA -31 allows <br />Page 9 <br />