My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Hawaii County Case Management (CM)
PublicDocuments
>
Office of Aging
>
Committee on Aging
>
Attachments/Meeting Handouts
>
March 2019
>
Hawaii County Case Management (CM)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/22/2019 2:36:10 PM
Creation date
5/22/2019 2:36:07 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
not be grant (Kupuna Care) funded, but County funded to make their employment security <br />and benefits the same as other HCOA employees. The state is mostly interested in generat- <br />ing uniform data to report to the federal offices, and we have already complied with adopt- <br />ing their (less user-friendly!) database. We can let them know we want to preserve pro- <br />cesses that have worked well for our clients for over 30 years. <br />C. We recommend ending the practice of awarding a single contract for all CM services; in- <br />stead, use different agencies as we do with other services in our vendor pool. For example, <br />during the lava crisis, Neighborhood Place of Puna was selected to provide case manage- <br />ment (there were also many referrals to Services for Seniors). Different vendors who pro- <br />vide specialty services, such as staff who speak other languages or know the culture of a lo- <br />cal area, could be selected to better meet the needs of clients. This flexibility could help <br />serve seniors more equitably across the island rather than being Hilo -centric. <br />D. Given the 30 year relationship with SFS which was created at the request of HCOA and <br />which has always been responsive to its needs, we do not want to lose that relationship and <br />the expertise that agency has developed over the years specifically serving kupuna. We <br />worry too that bringing CM totally in-house leaves us open to liability issues as well as Hu- <br />man Resource burdens. <br />In sum, our recommended mixed model preserves the connection to SFS while giving us more <br />vendor options, gives us time to test out streamlined internal processes that could improve the <br />timeliness of services, and continue our short-term Kupuna Care model that allows us to serve a <br />greater number of seniors. As a transition, we might need to extend the SFS contract for another <br />6 months or more, depending on what the county procurement allows. Such a transitionary pe- <br />riod should allow HCOA to identify and secure interested agencies that may be well suited in the <br />provision of case management services on a per referral basis. <br />Mahalo, <br />HCOA Advisory Committee on Aging <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.