My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2019-02-21 Liquor Adjudication Board Minutes (2)
PublicDocuments
>
Liquor Control
>
Liquor Adjudication Board
>
Minutes
>
2019
>
2019-02-21 Liquor Adjudication Board Minutes (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/31/2019 4:24:38 PM
Creation date
5/31/2019 4:24:10 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Gonzalez: Yes. I believe the report states that these were prior hostesses that had been <br />registered as hostesses at a different establishment before so they should have known. <br />Smith: Right. They did know because they were registered. Did you take that into account <br />when you were assessing the fine? <br />Gonzalez: We did. It kind of worked against us because the Licensee may have misunderstood. <br />She knew that they were already registered as hostesses, so the nuance there is that they have <br />to register for each bar they work in. They may have been registered as hostesses at another <br />bar, they may not have renewed; but we couldn't determine clearly if that was clearly <br />communicated to the owner from the hostess holding it. That is a really good question. <br />Smith: Okay. <br />Taniguchi: on the card it says the name of the establishment? <br />Schoen: The person I thought, it would be the person. <br />Gonzalez: It is the person. We keep track, we have the list for each of the hostess bars of who <br />is registered there. That's a good question, though. <br />Masuda: So they don't have one card per bar? <br />Gonzalez: The way the Rule reads they are supposed to. I will have to take a look at that <br />because we might only give them one card with a hostess number and we keep a list for each <br />bar they're at. Then you don't have to keep making different cards for them. Do you see what <br />I'm saying? <br />Mukai: So they actually had a card on them, then? <br />Smith: It expired. <br />Mukai: Oh, it expired? <br />Gonzalez: There was an expired one. <br />M u kai : Oh, I see. <br />Gonzalez: And one I think, couldn't provide a card for us. <br />Smith: But in your research it showed that one of them had it in 2014 and one of them had it in <br />2010, and it expired since they're only good for two years, right? <br />Gonzalez: Yes. <br />Smith: Okay. The other related question I have is the initial complaint that came in from the <br />patron, talked about them watering down liquor and it had the investigator open a couple bottles <br />of tequila and vodka, smelled it and said it smelled like alcohol. It seemed like there was a <br />complaint about them adulterating, putting something in bottles they are not supposed to. What's <br />the procedure to determine whether they're compliant and not doing what the complainant said? <br />FEBRUARY 21, 2019 - LIQUOR ADJUDICATION BOARD MINUTES 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.