My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2019-02-21 Liquor Adjudication Board Minutes (2)
PublicDocuments
>
Liquor Control
>
Liquor Adjudication Board
>
Minutes
>
2019
>
2019-02-21 Liquor Adjudication Board Minutes (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/31/2019 4:24:38 PM
Creation date
5/31/2019 4:24:10 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.r~ ,0aft. <br />Mukai: I'd like to vote. Her motion is still on the floor, right? <br />Masuda: No, she has no motion. She issued the recommendation. <br />Mukai: I'd like to make the motion that we fine the Licensee $250 for this violation. The <br />rationale... <br />Masuda: You can speak your motion, if there's a second. <br />Taniguchi: Second. <br />Mukai: The rationale for this and because we have concerns about their responses were to us. <br />I felt that the recommendation of the. $150 fine should be increased to let them know of the <br />seriousness of their not communicating with the Department. This sends them a message. <br />The fine amount is not astronomical where it hopefully will not hurt their business too negatively, <br />but at least it will send a message to them that there should be open lines of communication with <br />the Department in reasonably addressing the violation. <br />Smith: Motioned. <br />Taniguchi: I second. <br />Mr, Mukai moved that the Licensee in Case No. 2018-011, be <br />assessed a penalty in the amount of $250, to be paid within <br />thirty (30) days upon receipt of the Decision and order; <br />seconded by Mr. Taniguchi. <br />Smith: Seconded. I have a question. Do the facts support that level of fine? <br />Gonzalez: From the Department's perspective I would say there is. Based on the discussion <br />and the review of the reports and evidence, there is evidence to support that and this is not <br />imposing a punitive type of penalty. <br />Smith: Assuming we pass this and assess the fine of $250, wait thirty (30) days, if they don't <br />make payment, then you'll file additional charges and that would be added to the next (matter) <br />that would come before us and could have an increased penalty or further consequences? <br />Gonzalez: Correct, yes. <br />Smith: okay. All those in favor say, "Aye." <br />The Board Members voted "Aye." <br />Smith: Any opposition? <br />There was no opposition from the Board Members. <br />Smith: Hearing none, motion carried. A written Decision and order will be prepared and served <br />upon the Licensee, which shall be due and payable within thirty (30) days of its receipt. <br />FEBRUARY 21, 2019 -LIQUOR ADJUDICATION BOARD MINUTES 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.