My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2019-05-02 Hearing Transcript - Cellco Partnership dba Verizon Wireless USE 19-079
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2019
>
2019-05-02 Hearing Transcript - Cellco Partnership dba Verizon Wireless USE 19-079
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/6/2019 1:59:12 PM
Creation date
6/6/2019 1:59:03 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
AU: Mr. Chair? Before we get started, can I make a statement? I just want to put on the <br />record that I've read all the past documents and transcripts for this agenda item, and I am <br />prepared to vote on it. <br />CLARKSON: Thank you. Are we prepared to proceed Corp. Counsel with the application as <br />submitted or not? <br />HALL: Basically, you have two options. One is you could continue the item until <br />documentation is provided that they have a legal access or legal right -of -entry to the, through the <br />private road to the property, or you can condition it. You can add a condition that basically says <br />before they get their right to proceed with construction and such that they would need to provide <br />that documentation that they have legal access to the property. <br />CLARKSON: So, apparently, there is question as to whether the Applicant has legal access to <br />the property that they want the permit for. My question, and I'll ask the Director, is legal access <br />to the property in question normally a prerequisite for even accepting an application? <br />YEE: Yes. However, I do want to note that we did discuss this this morning with staff as we <br />learned about the issue and we did consider that we could condition it in this case, and so I think <br />that's a viable option, too, if the Commission wants to consider that. <br />DARROW: Good morning, Mr. Chairman. If I could just touch upon this matter. You're <br />absolutely correct. One of our pre -requisites is we make sure that there is legal access to a <br />particular project area. In this particular case, the Applicant—excuse me—the application <br />indicated that there was legal access through an existing public roadway, and we had, looking at <br />our maps, we had no means, or no issue to question it because even our maps indicated that it <br />was a private, I mean a government roadway. What ended up bringing it to our attention for us <br />to kind of look into it more was when staff had gone out on a site inspection, there was a, the <br />road was gated with a sign that said, "private road." <br />And, so at that point, they contacted, made contacts to different agencies to get information <br />regarding that roadway either being a County road, an old road -in -limbo, a State road, or if it was <br />actually private ownership. Through all of the research, it seems at this point that it is a private <br />roadway, that it's, even though it doesn't currently have a tmk for identifying ownership, in <br />discussion with the Department of Transportation, they indicated they do not own the road, and <br />that the road was owned by the adjoining land owner. <br />And, so at this point, there needs to be clarification that the Applicant has that legal access. It <br />may be something easy to provide. It may be something where they need to go and legally <br />acquire that access. So, we're just not sure to what length that may occur. <br />CLARKSON: Well, my question, and if I may take the lead on this, is the Applicant going to be <br />leasing, proposing to lease a portion of a fee parcel, does the owner of the fee parcel have access <br />over this private road? <br />DARROW: That's the same question. <br />EXHIBIT D <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.