My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Communication Number 2019-10 Waikoloa Intersection Subcommittee Report
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Action Committees (AC)
>
South Kohala Community Development Plan Action Committee
>
Communications
>
2019
>
Communication Number 2019-10 Waikoloa Intersection Subcommittee Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2021 9:11:29 AM
Creation date
6/24/2019 1:09:17 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Communication No. 2019-10 <br />Waikoloa Subcommittee's Waikoloa Road-Paniolo Avenue Intersection Report <br />severe injuries to any people involved. Roundabouts sometimes result in fewer total accidents of <br />all types, but occasionally result in a slight increase in total accidents, though with fewer and less <br />serious personal injuries. The main drawback of roundabouts is that it is more difficult for <br />pedestrians with vision disabilities to cross the road at a roundabout. <br />Other options, such as adding stop signs on Waikoloa Road or adding a pedestrian crossing <br />signal, could be considered, but the subcommittee advises again that the determination of what <br />improvements should be made should be the responsibility of professionals in the field. <br />9. Funding/Development Options <br />There are various funding options for making the needed Waikoloa-Paniolo intersection <br />improvements. The main options are, in no particular order: <br />1. County CIP process <br />2. Department of Public Works, Traffic Division <br />3. Developer obligations related to rezoning, subdivision, or building plan approvals <br />The option with the least cost to the County is the developer obligation option, but this has not <br />worked in this case. The property owners that were given a requirement to make improvements <br />have not developed their properties, and do not appear that they will do so any time soon, so this <br />option cannot be pursued unless a new developer enters the picture. See section 7 above for more <br />details on the current (unsuccessful) developer obligations. <br />The option that appears to have the shortest path to development is to work with the Department <br />of Public Works (DPW), specifically starting with the Traffic Division. The Traffic Division <br />could perform a traffic count at the intersection and then evaluate the data collected using their <br />expertise and tools. This would result in specific recommendations for improvements that would <br />address the issues revealed by the Traffic Division's evaluation. The recommendations would <br />then be passed to the Engineering Division at DPW for further analysis and planning. The <br />Engineering Division would be able to create a specific plan and request funding via CIP or via a <br />direct request to the County Council to appropriate funds for the needed improvements. The <br />improvement project could then proceed as planned by the Engineering Division. <br />The County CIP process is well-known and follows an annual review and approval process as <br />part of the County budget. This method of proposing a Waikoloa-Paniolo intersection <br />improvement project is suggested if the DPW is unable to move forward on the project directly, <br />or if an opportunity arises to submit a CIP with support from Council Members in the current <br />budget approval cycle. <br />10. Conclusion/Recommendations <br />June 18, 2019 Page 16 of] 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.