Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Wiseman: <br />Mr. Robinson: <br />Mr. Goodenow: <br />Mr. Heintz: <br />Mr. Goodenow: <br />Mr. Heintz: <br />Mr. Wiseman: <br />Mr. Heintz: <br />Mr. Wiseman: <br />Ms. Sumner -Mack: <br />Mr. Wiseman: <br />Ms. Sumner -Mack: <br />Mr. Yoshimoto: <br />Mr. Goodenow: <br />Mr. Yoshimoto: <br />Yeah. I'd go for two years. <br />I'd go for two years. <br />Okay. So let's do it this way to be a little formal. You want <br />discussion... <br />Well I have a question...I mean. The range and the nature of the <br />complaints could be quite diverse. Some of which, you might <br />want more than two years. But I'm thinking just look at this...I <br />mean what kind of complaints are we talking about here? <br />The complaint would be whether someone violated the code of <br />ethics. Either they... you know they... a fair treatment... or <br />Ah I see. Okay. <br />Let's take for example. Today. <br />This is an example here. <br />Today's issue. Let's say that someone under this had till 2024 to <br />file the complaint against this woman who wouldn't even be in <br />office at that time. So maybe wouldn't be in office. Yeah so that's <br />my concern...facts get old...people disappear...memories <br />fade...people die. <br />Well that's... excuse me. <br />Go ahead. I'm finished. <br />Well. Since our terms of office are five years. It might be wise to <br />have, have a six year period in which somebody could file a <br />complaint against someone who may no longer be on the Board <br />but which might be relevant and might be worth bringing up. <br />That's just my thought. If it's standard in many contracts and so <br />on, why limit ourselves in this case. <br />So Mr. Chairman? <br />Yes. <br />One issue to consider is...in the past...this Board has rendered <br />opinion basically saying that the Code of Ethics only applies to <br />current officers or employees so then...you know in scenarios <br />where they're no longer in that capacity. You know the six years <br />23 <br />