Laserfiche WebLink
CLARKSON: Okay. <br />KAY: Of subdividing. That said, DOT has required that there only be a single access to the <br />property from Puainako, and part of their comment letter that came back in 2008 also talked <br />about no access coming off of Kilauea as well. So, that it's possible that that would eliminate <br />the ability to do so although we would look at that at subdivision as well. <br />CLARKSON: And, then I have one—thank you. <br />KAY: Yes. <br />CLARKSON: I have one more question about Condition F. <br />KAY: Mm-hmm? <br />CLARKSON: If you could post that. <br />KAY: Yeah. <br />CLARKSON: There is a lot of discussion of the reasons for the amendment to the condition, <br />but, you know, the right -turn lane on Kekela Street, the right -in, right -out only off Puainako <br />Street, but none of that, as far as this Kekela part, none of those mitigation measures are in the <br />condition, and I'm just curious as to, I mean, it just says conform to Chapter 22, but it doesn't <br />say shall restripe these streets. <br />KAY: Yeah, so, another reason to keep Condition E, because Condition E says that not only <br />does DOT get a chance to review and make recommendations on the TIAR, but so does DPW, <br />and so DPW would be making those recommendations based on Kekela Street in that case. So, <br />it's kind of captured in that condition, pardon me, Condition E as well. So, I didn't want to <br />restate all of that. And, the reason is what is being recommended right now in terms of <br />mitigation has not been reviewed and approved yet by these agencies, so I didn't want to <br />prescribe anything there until the agencies have had an opportunity to review the most up-to-date <br />TIAR. <br />CLARKSON: Okay, well, the mitigation proposals make a lot of sense to me personally. <br />KAY: Mm-hmm. <br />CLARKSON: But, if they're not in the amended condition and DPW doesn't require them, then <br />they disappear. How do you make sure that they are actually done? <br />KAY: So, we've had conversations with DPW. So, initially when the application came in, in <br />2017, DPW provided a no comment—DPW Traffic provided a no comment. After kind of the <br />additional TIARs came in and there was now recommendations to restripe Kekela Street, DPW <br />EXHIBIT A <br />10 <br />