2019-06-06 Hearing Transcript - Autozone Parts REZ 06-052

Home

AGUINALDO: Oh, right there. Now, how you going constitute that? Are you guys keeping that driveway when you guys indicated as one point of entry in and out? KAY: So, again, thank you for the question. Based on DOT's comments back in 2008 and then their comments in 2017 and their initial response, they said we want to limit access to Puainako to a single access. So, this is just an existing concrete asphalt driveway that I believe either serviced an old dwelling that was there or the ginger farm. So, that will be eliminated as part of this, and the only access would be the right -in, right -out access from Puainako here if this development is built. AGUINALDO: So, is that going to be indicated as, you know, a condition that it's not going to be showing that? KAY: Yeah, I think, I think what they were trying to do here is just show kind of current conditions on the ground as well as what's being proposed. It's our understanding that that will go away once the development is built. AGUINALDO: Okay, I just was checking because it's close, yeah? KAY: Yeah, no, I understand, yeah. AGUINALDO: Okay. CLARKSON: Anymore questions? AGUINALDO: Nope, we're good. KAY: So, I did have just a few more points, and I'm sorry. So, in addition to the Director's recommendations on the requested amendments, the Director is also recommending some changes to additional conditions. Condition B which required payment of a water commitment, the Applicant has done that, so we have standard language that talks about maintaining valid water commitments. So, we just added that in there. We had a puka in Condition D since the Director is recommending deletion of that. And, so, we recommended a new Condition D that spoke to requirements to, from DOT, to set aside additional right-of-way for a DOT Puainako Street widening project in the future. So, this was that 2008 letter that came in from DOT. It had 11 conditions, the first of which was the Applicant was required to subdivide and dedicate zero to ten feet of additional right-of-way to accommodate this project. That wasn't done, and so, I spoke with DOT. DOT is fine with kind of putting that as a set aside strip for future dedication. And, so that's just the language here that in the future when DOT is ready to construct that project, the Applicant will subdivide and dedicate that additional right-of-way out at no cost to the State. And, then we just updated Condition L which is our standard condition around inadvertent archaeological finds, and it's just a new condition language that SHPD requested that we add to conditions. EXHIBIT A 12