Laserfiche WebLink
AU: Mr. Chair, I have a question. Christian, so you mentioned there is two reports, right? Two <br />TIARs? <br />KAY: Three. <br />AU: Three. <br />KAY: Correct. <br />AU: So, 2017, 2018, and there's 2019. <br />KAY: Correct. <br />AU: Okay. <br />KAY: Yeah, I didn't add the full report in 2019 again because most of it was the same, and I <br />wanted to save paper, so—but, the important pages and the pages that were different, I did add <br />for your review. <br />CLARKSON: I have a question. <br />KAY: Yes, sir. <br />CLARKSON: So, if the plans for the property change, and there were no requirement for <br />additional TIARs, wouldn't they still have to comply with, I think it was Chapter 22? <br />KAY: That's from the Kekela side <br />CLARKSON: —Yeah, okay <br />KAY: so Chapter 2 is County Streets, correct, uh huh. <br />CLARKSON: For the County side, and when they still have to comply with whatever conditions <br />would be set by the DOT? <br />KAY: Yes. <br />CLARKSON: Which could easily include a new TIAR. <br />KAY: Correct. <br />CLARKSON: But, if DOT decided that whatever this new project would be, they wouldn't <br />require a TIAR, would the Planning Department require it? In other words, you kind of <br />indicated that you're relying on the agencies to review the TIAR and to make their <br />recommendations for mitigation, but you don't want to rely on them to ask for the TIAR. We <br />EXHIBIT A <br />8 <br />