|
DARROW: It really depends on what happens during a particular process. And, again, when
<br />you see a lot of the cul-de-sacs in the upper areas, if there is an ability to provide connectivity
<br />through a Change of Zone or through some sort of action, then they can request that that
<br />connectivity be required. Like, let's say on the top part where you see the lack of connectivity,
<br />that probably was existing zoning, the subdivider came in, there was no connectivity planned on
<br />the lower portion, so they provided the cul-de-sacs. And, then eventually when the lower one
<br />came in, you couldn't go through a private property—you're already, at that point, your option is
<br />limited. So, they have to provide that type of cul-de-sac as well.
<br />As far as an overall plan, when a subdivision comes in, their goal is to provide connectivity.
<br />Most times, they are able to provide that, but there are times that their options are limited as far
<br />as cul-de-sac layouts. In this particular case that we're looking at for the light blue, that's why
<br />we're not asking for Mailani to be a cul-de-sac or a turnaround. Because we want to be able to
<br />provide that option in the future, just as the subdivision to the north did, to provide that
<br />connectivity as additional actions are done on those properties.
<br />CLARKSON: Okay, thank you. CanI just have one more question for Alex. Going back to
<br />the proposed subdivision plan for the parcel, I noticed that there are one -two -three, five lots that
<br />would be normally fronting the right-of-way for the Kikaha Street Extension that have—they are
<br />flag lots to get access from Mailani Street. And, yet, Jeff has said that Kikaha will eventually
<br />be extended if anybody ever subdivides the adjacent parcel. What effect will that have on access
<br />to those five lots?
<br />ROY: Yeah, I was going to say, they would most likely be provided access at that time, but one
<br />could argue that we don't know when that would be subdivided, so, as that's in private property.
<br />It's unsure if this would be subdivided into similar type of lots. So, it's unsure, but I would
<br />assume that. Yeah, if this was to open up, as with Abe Street, that these people would be
<br />provided that access.
<br />CLARKSON: Okay, thank you.
<br />AU: Mr. Chair, I got two questions. Question for Alex first. Regarding those five flag lots, so
<br />right now they're considered flag lots with the proposed development. So, in the future Kikaha
<br />opens up, someone develops, and those particular five flag lots will have two accesses for their
<br />property? And, is that allowed?
<br />ROY: Yeah, I'm not sure if that's allowed.
<br />DARROW: So, what most likely will happen is they would ask the developer to resubdivide
<br />those particular lots or the owners would have to make a decision whether or not they wanted
<br />access on Kikaha or on Mailani, and at that point, a subdivision would have to occur which
<br />changes that particular allowance for access. That occurs not too often, but it occurs on an
<br />occasion where we get a subdivision just to identify an additional access. If it's similar to this
<br />particular case where they now have an option to go on a main road instead of a flag lot.
<br />EXHIBIT A
<br />14
<br />
|