My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
01-09-18 Regular Session Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2011-2018
>
2018
>
01-09-18 Regular Session Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/7/2019 1:19:21 PM
Creation date
2/13/2018 4:04:17 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
paper, represented by counsel, the right of cross-examination, <br />notice to all parties... that's in our rules as well. <br />Mr. Goodenow: I'll wait ... you continue I gonna start going into discussion so <br />better be quiet ... thank you. <br />Mr. Yoshimoto: A couple of points of clarifications ... Mr. Tucker please feel free to <br />interject if I'm saying something not accurate... okay so ... we <br />talked about the confidentiality rules ... we talked about the board <br />in the process of amending its rules and in terms of...you asked me <br />a question as far as whether there was any precedent in filing a <br />petition against the entire ethics board and I said not to my <br />knowledge... there has been in the past a petition... ethics petition <br />filed against some members of the board right and it's legal <br />counsel ... so basically what happened in that situation is ... once <br />there was enough of a board seated that did not have a conflict of <br />interest in hearing the matter ... then the board could address it at <br />that point but in terms of you know your question about whether <br />the entire board ... I'm not aware of anything being filed against the <br />entire board because I think your question was well what happens <br />then and I said well the board can't hear it if then entire board is <br />named right ... I think that was our conversation but anyway ... so <br />that's.... <br />Ms. Kahakalau: Kenny? <br />Mr. Goodenow: Well about the mediation... short of a public ... whole thing with <br />you know ... how could ... well what is your thoughts on that.... <br />Mr. Yoshimoto: Oh no so on the issue of mediation I said because he concern was <br />addressed to the board and myself ... I said that ... the board needed <br />to address the mediation issue you know directly with you because <br />they're also a party to this ... it's not my call ... it's the board's call <br />to decide on you know ... I don't know what your thoughts are on <br />mediation so now is your opportunity to talk to the board about <br />you know what your thoughts are as far as mediation ... that was <br />my response as far as how to address it right because I can't <br />respond but the board can. <br />Ms. Kahakalau: Okay ... I'd like to take it a step back if it's okay and go back to the <br />issue of discovery... you heard what our counsel said...does that <br />make sense or does it not make sense or do we need to talk further <br />about it...do we ... do you have any suggestions etc. <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.