|
study. And the traffic study, the updated traffic study was done, and that study basically
<br /> concluded that the Level of Service at the Puapua`anui intersection and the Ho`omama Street
<br /> intersection would still be retained at Level of Service A, you know, with or without the church.
<br /> And at the primary intersection at Puapua`anui and the Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway Extension,
<br /> the Level of Service would still be retained at B. Part of the reasons is that the activity time,
<br /> usually Level of Service is related to the A.M. and P.M. peak hours, like in this situation over
<br /> here the primary movements do not occur during the A.M. and P.M. peak hours. There is no
<br /> question about it that when you introduce any new activity in this area, you will have cars, you
<br /> will have cars. So the question is like whether the volume, you know, compromises the Level of
<br /> Service, and from a technical standpoint, it does not. Notwithstanding that the applicant was
<br /> very sensitive of the concerns that were raised, and as a result, as mentioned in the initial
<br /> presentation, they looked at alternative access and that alternative access would come in from
<br /> Hualalai Road, and also, there would be a dedicated construction access from Hualalai Road as
<br /> well. And both of those are reflected in the staff's condition based on the representations that we
<br /> had advanced to the Planning Department.
<br /> On the issue of speeding, we would, we would kind of maintain that, you know, if you are
<br /> coming in from Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway and you are making a left turn into Puapua`anui,
<br /> it's only a short drag and it's only like, it's the first intersection, so, you know, there is really
<br /> very little opportunity to speed; it's one block. Likewise, if you are exiting the church and you
<br /> are making a right turn, it's only one block, you know, to the Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway. If
<br /> you are going to go on Hualalai Road, you are going to go off on Hualalai Road and the
<br /> secondary access, so you are not continuing up and speeding on Puapua`anui Road. So, I think
<br /> that while the concern of speeding is there, if, you know, with this project, I don't think you
<br /> would be attributable to the operations of the church, as much as people within the community or
<br /> people coming in from the Hualalai, you know, mauka section and using Puapua`anui as a
<br /> secondary access to Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway. So, thank you very much, Mr. Chair.
<br /> CHURCH: A couple questions here. One of my concerns is water. And, I'm, from personal
<br /> experience, having a hard time with the Fire Department responding with things that require
<br /> sprinklers for instance, and also the Department of Water Supply, and they seem to be really
<br /> bogged down. As we know from personal experiences, how many times have these water pumps
<br /> that are serving our area been up and down, been replaced? The pumps go in and are hooked up
<br /> wrong, and so these things get delayed and delayed. So, I think that the water availability to me
<br /> would seem to be a major issue. That would be my first question.
<br /> FUKE: Sure. I had discussions with—and it's kind of reflected in staff's report—with the
<br /> Department of Water Supply on that, because each of the property currently is allocated like two
<br /> water units right now. And I had some question as far as the availability, you know, of water for
<br /> our project of this nature. So in discussions with the Water Department, we looked at actual
<br /> situation not only of the Living Stones church in Kailua-Kona. The Kailua-Kona situation, the
<br /> use of the water is a little higher than normal because they use it for landscaping. So the more
<br /> comparable one, primarily for potable purposes, related to the LDS church in Hilo off of
<br /> Ponahawai Street and it's a very sizable church with a lot of—I don't think they have 600
<br /> parking stalls, but—they do have at least like about 150 or 200, and their average daily water use
<br /> was like less than 400 gallons a day. So, based upon that, and, you know, we did the calculation,
<br /> 17
<br /> EXHIBIT A
<br />
|