2019-06-20 Leeward Exh B (Amend Kona CDP)

Home

PLUNKETT: Yes, if, so if you read, for some of them, especially on the second page, where the red, so all red is our response, and we are just stating that why we see that – so let me just read it, “Suggestion for DOT verification deemed appropriate ….” So, “appropriate” but per the scope we see that we want to do it for the comprehensive review, whereas in the, for the bullets that have two responses, the top response is kind of just like our reasoning and the second one, the reason why it’s bolded is because in the CDP the policies are in bold and then the language of the Policy follows later, so we’re just trying to match the format of the Policy and make the amendment in the red so that it can be adopted straight into the original, or Exhibit A, the amendment package. CARR SMITH: Right, okay, so those are the ones that you suggest. PLUNKETT: Correct. CARR SMITH: Can I just ask one more question on this document? It was a little bit hard to understand it at times because, as you just said, some of it is bolded. I assume that the actual changes are either crossed out or underlined, but yet some of the bolded areas at the end that state who made the suggestion, you know, PR, PD, are those new or, new comments or are those old comments where it has the department at the end of the bolded statement? PLUNKETT: So those are, you find those at the end of Actions, Action statements, and those acronyms of agencies or non-profit organizations who are suggested initiators— CARR SMITH: Right— PLUNKETT: —of— CARR SMITH: —I get that. PLUNKETT: —the Policy. CARR SMITH: But, that’s from before— PLUNKETT: No. CARR SMITH: —when it was first created? PLUNKETT: Oh, yeah, yeah, yes, it’s from the original. CARR SMITH: So if it’s not underlined, it’s not new. Is that a— PLUNKETT: Correct. CARR SMITH: —general, that’s totally true. PLUNKETT: Yeah. 8 EXHIBIT B