My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2019-06-10 Regular Session Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2019
>
2019-06-10 Regular Session Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/10/2019 11:07:25 AM
Creation date
8/22/2019 1:47:14 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Wiseman: Just one point of order. Signatories...I prefer they are the <br />petitioners. <br />Mr. Goodenow: <br />Mr. Wiseman: <br />Mr. Goodenow: <br />Mr. Yoshimoto: <br />Mr. Wiseman: <br />Mr. Yoshimoto: <br />Mr. Wiseman: <br />Mr. Goodenow: <br />Mr. Yoshimoto: <br />Ms. Kaho`opi`i: <br />Mr. Yoshimoto: <br />Mr. Goodenow: <br />Mr. Yoshimoto: <br />Mr. Goodenow: <br />Alright... <br />The fact that they signed. It doesn't alter the petition. <br />Would the Corp. Counsel please show us right? It's in the rules <br />that say form of petition. Petition must be signed. <br />Right. So what is the question? <br />The reference is...that we're hearing...is signatories. But actually <br />they are petitioners. <br />Right. So. <br />Then we just refer to them as petitioners rather than signatory <br />Could we waive the rules? <br />No he's just asking to refer to them as petitioners' right. So just so <br />it's clear and anybody correct me if I'm wrong. Ms. Kaho`opii is <br />present and she's signed the petition. She's a... <br />Petitioner. <br />A petitioner right. And then she's designated... She said a couple <br />of things right. One...is that they're okay and they want to <br />proceed today. Right? I didn't hear anything about the request <br />that Ms. Paik-Mander be able to listen in on the hearing. That's <br />still pending. But that they want to have Ms. Harden again <br />represent the boards, I mean represent the petitioners' position. <br />Correct? Yeah. <br />And that's good. Okay. So I think we're. <br />So what about the telephone. I was trying to make sure... <br />Well...I wasn't gonna move on it unless they wanted to request <br />that now. But my feeling on that is if she's not gonna participate. <br />I mean she can read the transcript. I know that may sound cold but <br />we can have a vote on it. If there's no objections, I'm not gonna <br />change anything about the phone. And if anyone objects, we can <br />have a discussion. Hearing no objections...we're gonna proceed <br />then. So if now the respondent can come forward please and thank <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.