Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Kierkiewicz: No ownership. <br />Mr. Heintz: So you have no ownership. <br />Ms. Kierkiewicz: I was simply an employee. <br />Mr. Heintz: Just an employee. Okay. And finally if you could help me a little <br />bit. Are there a lot of these senior account executives it sounds <br />like it? <br />Ms. Kierkiewicz: I was the only one. <br />Mr. Heintz: You're the only? <br />Ms. Kierkiewicz: Yes. <br />Mr. Heintz: Oh so that's very... <br />Ms. Kierkiewicz: On the island and I did some work statewide. <br />Mr. Heintz: Okay thank you. <br />Ms. Kierkiewicz: You're welcome. <br />Mr. Goodenow: Any other questions? I do have one question for the petitioner. I <br />notice on the petition, you cite the conflict of interest provision. <br />And that provision does talk about the substantial financial interest. <br />I didn't see anything regarding fair treatment. So no one's alleging <br />that Ms. Kierkiewicz was trying to get unwarranted privileges for <br />herself or her employer. No one's putting that forward right. <br />We're just on this conflict of interest. Should there have been <br />a...introducing the bill maybe and second the disclosure. Is that <br />correct. I wanna make sure we're clear on that. <br />Ms. Harden: Since I don't hear well, could you repeat that? <br />Mr. Goodenow: <br />I didn't say it very well either. So you guys are bringing forward <br />the conflict of interest provisions saying that they were violated. <br />You're not though bringing up, fair treatment provisions in the <br />ethics code. Saying that Ms. Kierkiewicz was not being impartial <br />or she was trying to secure unwarranted privileges, advantages for <br />herself or her employer right. You're not...that's not in the <br />petition. The petition is only should she have introduced the bill <br />and should she have disclosed this and recused. That's really the <br />only thing in the petition. Do I have that correct? <br />26 <br />