Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Takai moved to decrease the land value to $13,300, sustain the building value at $582,000 <br />with no exemption. Seconded by Mrs. Ford. A call for discussion was made. Motion passed <br />by a vote of 4:0. <br /> <br />CASE #37487 – CORREA, HENRY J JR TRST <br />TMK 2-4-030-095-0000 <br /> <br />Present were appellant’s representative, Henry Correa III, and County appraiser Shannon Arquitola. <br /> <br />Property located on Malia Street in the Ainalako area below Ainaola Drive and Haihai junction. <br /> <br />Appeal on building value. <br /> <br />Appellant’s representative presented their case. County presented their case and recommended <br />sustaining the building value at $421,600 and land value at $96,000. A call for questions was made. <br /> <br />Mrs. Ford moved to sustain the County’s building value of $421,600. Seconded by Mr. <br />Hughes. A call for discussion was made. Motion passed by a vote of 4:0. <br /> <br />CASE #37488 – HJC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION <br />TMK 2-4-041-015-0000 <br /> <br />Present were appellant’s representative, Henry Correa III, and County appraiser Shannon Arquitola. <br /> <br />Property located on Komohana Street in Hilo. <br /> <br />Appeal on land and building values. <br /> <br />Appellant’s representative presented their case. County presented their case and recommended <br />sustaining the building value at $313,100 and land value at $150,300. A call for questions was made. <br /> <br />Mrs. Ford moved to sustain the County’s building value at $313,100 and land value at <br />$150,300. Seconded by Mr. Takai. A call for discussion was made. Motion passed by a vote <br />of 4:0. <br /> <br />Recessed: 10:26 a.m. <br />Reconvened: 10:38 a.m. <br /> <br />CASE #37445 – BIRK, WAYNE E <br />TMK 2-6-011-035-0000 <br /> <br />Present was appellant Wayne Birk. Ms. Costa presented for the County. <br /> <br />Property located on Kaiwiki Road. <br /> <br />Appeal on land and building values. <br /> <br />County informed the Board that they had entered into a settlement agreement with the appellant, <br />however, the appellant has since decided to rescind the agreement and to bring his appeal case <br />before the Board. <br /> <br /> 2 <br /> <br />