My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2019-08-28 BDHRA Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Banyan Drive HRA
>
Minutes
>
2019
>
2019-08-28 BDHRA Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/25/2019 9:35:40 AM
Creation date
9/25/2019 9:35:29 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MORRISON: So let's take a look, Brian, and I'm looking at this area and it looks a little bit <br /> strange cause it's kind of smaller, and so we might have to, that might be a scale question about <br /> where that if that's the same kind of general area that this is being applied. But I think <br /> otherwise, those things have been captured. So what this is, is your folks plan had commercial <br /> mixed use in this reddish color and we translated that to a medium density urban, which would <br /> allow for multi-family and commercial. Let's see, the density would be, I think 30 units per acre. <br /> DELIMA: Okay, well, it's interesting you say that because in the `90s, when the previous owner <br /> of the Ice House had planned a mixed use, there was a lot of community opposition to hotel units <br /> being next to the park. So, you know, I think we should be cognizant of that, but at the same time <br /> the comments have been that if you want it to be more attractive, that site, you need to give the <br /> landowner the ability to, to invest. And I've previously disclosed that I represented Mr. Bockrath <br /> in him obtaining a use permit way back when, when Mr. Kanuha was the Planning Director. I'm <br /> not really sure. And so I've disclosed that I don't represent him, I haven't for a long time, I don't <br /> believe I have a conflict, but I think it's important to note that I had a previous relationship with <br /> Mr. Bockrath particularly on this site. And prior to that, I represented the previous owner, so I'm <br /> pretty familiar with that site and it's always been bothersome that you don't give the landowner <br /> the ability to make common sense use of their property so they can invest, so it doesn't become a <br /> blight to that peninsula. But at the same time, we don't wanna go to the extreme of doing things <br /> that people would be objectionable, which I think, I think having housing units that in the past <br /> has been a concern. But I'm open to that. And, oh, another comment I wanted to know is in <br /> terms of the resort designation, does it go all the way down to where Mr. Inouye's property is? <br /> MORRISON: I'm not sure where his property is. <br /> DELIMA: It goes right up to Reed's Bay, the vacant lot right by Reed's Bay. <br /> MORRISON: So it is intended to mirror where this was here. So we can look at that closer if it <br /> doesn't mirror that, but that was the intent behind the map. <br /> DELIMA: So the resort designation does allow for condo use as well? <br /> MORRISON: Yes. So just point of clarification for you folks about what this map does, right, it <br /> guides future land use decisions. So it does not change anybody's zoning, it doesn't change their <br /> permitted uses, they'd have to still go through that process. But, in going through that process, <br /> this map would then be guiding that decision-making. <br /> DELIMA: So the land use designation would allow for condo use? <br /> MORRISON: Resort, yes, does allow for condominium use. <br /> DELIMA: Okay. What about mixed condo? <br /> Page 4 of 19 <br /> Banyan Drive Hawaii Redevelopment Agency <br /> August 28,2019 Minutes <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.