Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> Vote: All commissioners voted aye to approve the minutes with the changes noted <br />above. <br /> <br />3. STATEMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC ON AGENDA ITEMS <br /> <br /> Jerome Warren: The court case against Dora Beck regarding the Nāālehu sewer is ʻ <br />still ongoing. At the court hearing on August 8, Director Kucharski continued to erase the <br />history of the Nāālehu sewer project, and Dora Beck was absent. The director claimed no ʻ <br />knowledge of events leading up to his federal administrative order on consent. The <br />department also has another court case for the solid waste site in Ocean View. Regarding <br />the General Plan, the Planning Department came to Nāālehu on August 25 and set up a ʻ <br />display at the community center at the ballpark. Director Yee was not wearing a name tag, <br />but all his staff were. Nobody wanted to discuss why Planning allowed a disgruntled <br />homeowner to block off the access road leading to the ballpark. Mr. Yee was dismissive. <br />The property owner, John Ketchmark, shut down the road because he was angry at Dora <br />Beck for lying to him about his property remaining on the sewer system. He was cut off <br />and had to dig a cesspool, so he retaliated by fencing off the access road that leads to the <br />park. In summary, the mismanagement of the Nāālehu sewer project has caused a decline ʻ <br />in access to the park. Regarding the August 27 newspaper article on non-payment of sewer <br />bills in Nāālehu, some elementary school students are worried their families have to go to ʻ <br />court. Nancy Cook-Lauer picked up the story and wrote an informative article. When you <br />stop a household’s water, you are punishing innocent people who live in the house and <br />neighbors who are affected by the poor sanitation and fire hazard. None of his statements <br />have ever bothered any commissioner, and the Water Department also remains dismissive. <br />The average citizen can’t be expected to follow your advice if you ignore their basic needs. <br /> <br />4. UNFINISHED BUSINESS <br /> <br />a. Follow up on the July 24, 2019, motion to suggest a better description <br />for the Soil Aquifer Treatment ponds proposed for the Kealakehe R-1 <br />upgrade, and discuss a proposed letter from the commission to the <br />director on this. <br /> <br /> Chair Bennett said a motion was passed at the previous meeting to recommend the <br />department consider different terminology for the SAT ponds. He drafted a letter to the <br />director about this, and it was provided to the commissioners for review. The letter points <br />out why the SAT terminology is not sound and why he recommends calling the system a <br />Nutrient Removal System. It is important because it is the first such system in the state, <br />and it goes the extra mile to remove nutrients from the wastewater before it gets <br />discharged to the ground and hence to the ocean. <br /> <br /> Motion and second: Commissioner Fritz moved to accept everything that was said <br />in the letter, and Vice Chair Olson seconded the motion. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />