Laserfiche WebLink
applicant come back to the Commission and request for the extension so that they can speak <br />directly to how they are going to finish this project if they haven't even started. <br />CLARKSON: For project specific permits, which all of these are, my feeling would be give <br />them plenty of time to get to some kind of milestone that marks the completion of whatever they <br />were proposing. Plenty of time so that there is no need for administrative extensions. They've <br />got time to go get their financing. They've got time to get their Building Permit. They've got <br />time to build it, and whatever that marker was that was set up in the beginning, if that's not <br />reached by that time, it's all over. The permit is void. They gotta start all over again. That's my <br />feeling for project specific permits. <br />DARROW: And, I believe that's the direction of the Leeward Planning Commission, too. I <br />think that's what they want to see, is they want to see a specific expiration date the permit <br />becomes void, and it's just, we change our rules to make that happen. We don't have to go <br />through another process where we bring `em in and void the permit. It's just clearly stated as a <br />condition in the permit. At that point, yes, they would have, they wouldn't come in with a time <br />extension. <br />So, that's the question, right? So, let's say it's, you give them ten years to do this project. Nine <br />years, nine months they come in a with a time extension. Do we say okay? Or do we say nope, <br />you gotta come in with a new permit. <br />CLARKSON: Exactly, they gotta come in with a new permit. <br />DARROW: Okay. <br />CLARKSON: There's no extension period <br />DARROW: Beyond that time. <br />CLARKSON: They gotta come in with their final. They gotta come in with their certificate of <br />occupancy. They gotta come in with some document from some agency that says originally that <br />was part of the permit. You gotta come in by this time with this document or your permit is <br />void. <br />HALL: I would just caution on thein the law, basically, there is the rule of like, you know, if <br />you have substantial commencement, taking away entitlements can get tricky. So, I would say a <br />more case-by-case basis on that situation. If you come in at nine years or whatever, we still, I <br />think you still have to look at how much of the project they have completed. Like you said, if <br />they're half way done or even, you know, 90 percent done, and they just can't get that CO <br />because, you know, the floor that they put in is peeling or something. You know, I think we <br />have to really look at—it's really hard to do like one rule for everything. I feel like there really <br />needs to be project—for project specific permits, there kind of needs to be a project, like a case- <br />by-case basis basically. So, that's all I would caution the Commission on is if we try to put <br />everybody in the same box. Not everybody is going to fit, and we may run into problems where, <br />EXHIBIT D <br />9 <br />