Laserfiche WebLink
-ie- Business: <br />1. Leeward Planning Commission Public Meeting Regarding the Kona CDP Amendments. <br />A complete transcript of this hearing [Communication Number 2019-22] is available to view and <br />download at the following website: <br />http://records.hawaiicounty.gov/Weblink/1/doc/100971/Pagel.aspx <br />This meeting was a concurrent Leeward Planning Commission meeting and a Kona Community <br />Development Plan Action Committee meeting to abide by the Sunshine Law (HRS Chapter 92) and <br />enable the CDP Action Committee members to attend and provide comments to the commissioners. <br />The purpose was to determine passage of the Kona Community Development Plan Amendments to go <br />before County Council's Planning Committee. Members of the Kona CDP Action Committee attended <br />this meeting and were able to testify and answer questions from the Leeward Planning Commission. <br />Planner Plunkett gave a brief presentation that gave some background of the process to amend the <br />CDP so far and the reason for its initiation. He explained that after the Action Committee had <br />submitted their recommended changes, the Planning Department had discovered additional items that <br />required amending such as the plan's narrative and actions. Planning Department staff had cross- <br />referenced the language of the plan with the Hawai'i County Code and Hawai'i Revised Statutes, and <br />had additionally sought consultation from other County departments and agencies. <br />Planner Plunkett additionally explained that they had received additional suggestions from the <br />Department of Public Works and the Department of Water Supply that were included in the <br />amendment package [Communication Number 2019-19]. These agency comments may be viewed or <br />downloaded at the following website: <br />http://records.hawaiicounty.gov/Weblink/1/doc/100705/Pagel.aspx <br />Commissioners engaged in discussion and asked clarifying questions about the amendments with <br />Planning staff and Corporation Counsel. Commissioners shared some reservations about several <br />policies and questioned the reasoning behind the amendments. <br />Commissioner Vitousek asked how this interim review would fit into the plans for a future <br />comprehensive review of the CDP. Planning Staff responded that General Plan lays out the <br />comprehensive review process, that the comprehensive review of the CDP might take some time and <br />that it is important to fix the legal ambiguity and contradictions that exist in the plan in the meantime. <br />Commissioner Vitousek brought up his concerns for replacing or strengthening the mandatory <br />language in several policies. For TRAN-3.4 Retrofit Existing Streets and TRAN-3.5 Safe Routes to School, <br />Mr. Vitousek felt that taking away the mandatory language would diminish the County's impetus to <br />fund and complete such projects. For the TRAN-3.5 he argued that not having safe routes to school is <br />also a major safety concern for keiki. Commissioner Vitousek also shared his concern for policy LU -3.8 <br />Rezoning Outside of Urban and Rural TODs, where he felt the mandatory language could be loosened <br />to avoid blocking a development which may be beneficial for the community but that would be located <br />outside of a Rural TOD area. He further suggested strengthening the language for policy ENV -1.1 <br />Central Environmental Resources and loosening the mandatory language for policy CR -2.2 Regulatory <br />System. <br />Commissioner Perry shared a concern that the amendments to PUB -4.3 Agricultural Water changed <br />the intention of the CDP to uphold agriculture as an important aspect of the rural character of Kona. <br />Planning Staff responded that the mandatory language of many of the policies were found to commit <br />the County to spending money which may not be available. They shared that having mandatory <br />www.hiplannin,-dept.com konana,hawaiicounty.gov Page 3 <br />