My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2019-09-17 Kailua Village Design Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Kailua Village Design Commission
>
Minutes
>
2006-2024
>
2019
>
2019-09-17 Kailua Village Design Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/6/2019 9:32:13 AM
Creation date
11/6/2019 9:32:06 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
additional eleven inches the revised design of the lowered parapet and the mansard roof would <br /> make the whole building appear shorter. Commissioner Ikeuchi further asked if the rooftop <br /> equipment would be noticeable without the eleven-inch increase. Mr. Conte responded that <br /> some of it would be visible, and that also because of the clearance necessary for interior features, <br /> it could not be lowered any more. Commissioner Hetherington commented that as an architect, <br /> he understood that trying to make everything fit in a limited space was challenging, especially in <br /> commercial buildings, and that he would not mind the eleven-inch increase considering the fact <br /> that they had made the orchestrating effort to drop the mansard. <br /> Chairman Roth commented that he had been a little disappointed at the degree of height <br /> reduction, but that the addition of plumeria trees made him change his mind. He explained that <br /> one of his concerns had been that according to the original landscape plan, the trees along the <br /> building would not screen the street facing elevation, which he did not find appealing, for a long <br /> time, but that the eight-foot high plumeria trees would screen it even before the kamani trees <br /> grew tall. He also commented that he saw no problem with the proposed propane tank, which <br /> was small and would be completely hidden behind vegetation. Ms. Bugado reminded the <br /> Commission, however, that the location of the tank would still have to go through Plan Approval <br /> analysis to make sure that it met code requirements. <br /> It was moved by Commissioner Hetherington and seconded by Commissioner Kern that the <br /> Commission forward to the Planning Director a recommendation for approval of the proposal as <br /> presented. There being no discussion on the motion, a roll call vote was taken and the motion <br /> carried with six ayes (Hetherington, Kern, Ching, Ikeuchi, Sullenberger and Werchick), no noes <br /> and two absent and excused (Crusat and Smith). <br /> NEW BUSINESS <br /> 2. The applicant, Shani Armbruster, is proposing exterior improvements to the Coconut <br /> Grove Marketplace Bongo Ben Restaurant, specifically replacement of the awning with <br /> a metal roof along Alii Drive. <br /> Landowner: Eugene K Gregory Trust <br /> TMK: (3) 7-5-009:027 <br /> Location: 75-5819 Alii Drive <br /> In her PowerPoint presentation, Ms. Bugado clarified that the proposal was to remove existing <br /> metal-framed awning and canvas awning and install a permanent wood-framed metal awning to <br /> match the existing metal roof. She noted that there was a variance allowing the open space <br /> encroachment at the present awning location, as well as a like-for-like replacement of the <br /> awning. She said that while the location of the new awning appeared to comply with the <br /> variance, whether the variance had to be amended or a new variance was required for the use of <br /> different material would have to be determined during the Plan Approval process. <br /> Asked by Commissioner Hetherington about the drawing attached to the variance, Ms. Bugado <br /> explained that what had triggered the variance had been the then-applicant's building permit <br /> application to replace already-existed canvas awnings, thus the notation, "EXISTING FIXED <br /> CANVAS AWNINGS TO BE REMOVED," and that the variance had allowed a like-for-like <br /> replacement of those awnings. Also in response to Commissioner Hetherington's question, she <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.