My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2019-10-23 Meeting Minutes (EMC)
PublicDocuments
>
Environmental Management
>
Environmental Management Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
2019-10-23 Meeting Minutes (EMC)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2019 12:49:11 PM
Creation date
12/3/2019 12:49:44 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />b. Discuss the costs, including interest charged, for the Kealakehe Wastewater <br />Treatment Plant R-1 Upgrade Project. <br /> Chair Bennett asked the director to provide some guidance on how the cost statements <br />are derived. <br /> <br /> Director Kucharski explained that the original published cost for the R-1 system was $54 <br />million, which was the figure in the initial request for funds. The R-1 system was designed to be <br />expandable, depending on demand. The original proposal was for the system to handle a <br />million gallons per day, but if it is expanded to 5 million gallons per day, the cost goes way up. <br />There are some activities included in the cost that are not directly related to R-1, and he is <br />having the consultants pull those out. Additional expenses are related to the SAT design and <br />the fact that all the water will be UV treated. He believes the revised cost will be about $75 <br />million, and he will have a better cost estimate at the next meeting. <br /> <br /> Two funding sources are being looked at. The first is SRF funds, which have a very low <br />interest rate. Repayment would come from the General Fund, not through the sewer rates, <br />and would be on the capital investment. The other funding source is the Bureau of <br />Reclamation. A $634,000 grant was received to do a technical and financial feasibility study. <br />Once the study is submitted, they will be eligible for additional construction funds of up to $20 <br />million or 25% of the construction cost. However, another EIS would need to be done. If they <br />were to start construction without the grant, the project can be done sooner. If they go with <br />the grant, construction will be delayed because of the need for an EIS, but the cost will be <br />covered. He does not know how the dynamics will work out as far as cost mitigation. <br /> <br /> A $750,000 grant from the state was also received to deal with the double pipe system <br />for the county regional park. This park may be the first in the state designed with a purple pipe <br />and potable water system together. <br /> <br /> Director Kucharski also mentioned the high cost of construction in Hawaiʻi. For <br />example, installing a sewer line normally costs about $1.8 million per mile in the County of <br />Hawaiʻi, but for the Lono Kona area it is costing about $4 million per mile. The real cost will not <br />be known until the project goes out to bid. <br /> <br /> Chair Bennett said the next agenda should include a discussion on alternatives to <br />running sewer lines, given the high costs, as it may be economically unfeasible. The <br />conversation needs to be started, as there are 50,000 cesspits on the island and providing <br />sewers to all is not the solution. <br /> <br />c. Discuss the “waste to energy” proposals being considered by the County <br />Council. <br /> Chair Bennett said there have been many news reports recently on waste to energy, and <br />he would like to hear the thoughts of the commissioners on this. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.