My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2019-04-24 Merit Appeals Board Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Human Resources
>
Merit Appeals Board
>
Minutes
>
2019
>
2019-04-24 Merit Appeals Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/23/2019 2:45:34 PM
Creation date
12/9/2019 3:13:00 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Merit Appeals Board April 24, 2019 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />And in that request they submitted, they made that request for each of the commissions to <br />provide information for the Salary Commission to consider as they review and come up with a <br />plan regarding the current or their respective department head and deputy salary. <br /> <br /> So, that’s the request that was made to you, the Merit Appeals Board, was to provide <br />information—come and provide information to the Salary Commission regarding my—and, well, <br />my vacant deputy position salary. So, that’s where they’re at. That’s the basis of this. And <br />because—J can explain to you the rules of the Board as to why it’s a formal agendized item. <br /> <br />CHR. NAMAHOE: So, I admit I was confused when I saw the e-mail because of the specifics of <br />this particular Board—was it really for Mr. Brilhante or was it about salaries in general for the <br />County. <br /> <br />MR. BRILHANTE: No, it’s specific to my salary— <br /> <br />CHR. NAMAHOE: And the vacant position— <br /> <br />MR. BRILHANTE: Yeah. <br /> <br />CHR. NAMAHOE: —okay. Did you, gentlemen, receive that—or have you read it? It’s in <br />here, correct? I don’t know how to discuss this. <br /> <br />MR. YOSHIMOTO: In terms of—do you have a legal question? We can go into executive <br />session—there’s four of us—oh, well, if it’s a non-legal question, then we can have an open <br />discussion. <br /> <br />MR. BRILHANTE: Let me clarify this a little bit more. So, the commission is just requesting <br />that a member from the Merit Appeals Board come and testify to them at their next hearing to <br />provide information regarding what you, as a Board, would recommend the salary of the <br />Department of HR—the Department of HR be. <br /> <br />The reason it has to be formal is because for a board member to come and give that information, <br />it would have to be through a vote of the Merit Appeals Board authorizing that member to <br />officially go and make a statement—and that’s why it’s on the agenda. <br /> <br />CHR. NAMAHOE: So, then, this is something that should be taken into executive session <br />because, really, any discussion might start covering legal territory. <br /> <br />MR. YOSHIMOTO: Possibly, depending on the question that you ask. We could start there and <br />then see where we go. <br /> <br />CHR. NAMAHOE: And then, afterwards, (inaudible). <br /> <br />Page 14 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.