My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2019-04-24 Merit Appeals Board Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Human Resources
>
Merit Appeals Board
>
Minutes
>
2019
>
2019-04-24 Merit Appeals Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/23/2019 2:45:34 PM
Creation date
12/9/2019 3:13:00 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Merit Appeals Board April 24, 2019 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />RECESS: The Chair called for a recess at 9:55 a.m. to convene executive session. <br /> <br />RECONVENE: Open session reconvened at 10:17 a.m. <br /> <br />CHR. NAMAHOE: So, now that we are in open session. Okay, so now that we’re in open <br />session—is the issue at hand, is there—are any of you gentlemen interested to present in front of <br />the Salary Commission? <br /> <br />MR. CHILLINGWORTH: I’m not. <br /> <br />MR. TAM: Yeah, I’m not really interested. <br /> <br />CHR. NAMAHOE: Given the way that it’s been discussed so far, do we consider that presenting <br />in front of the Salary Commission is a decision that we should make—that we should agree to <br />do? <br /> <br />MR. CHILLINGWORTH: So, the question is—should we make a presentation to the Salary <br />Commission? I think we should. <br /> <br />CHR. NAMAHOE: Okay. That’s a question. Mitch? <br /> <br />MR. TAM: I’m sorry? Yes, we should. <br /> <br />CHR. NAMAHOE: Okay, thank you. <br /> <br />MR. TAM: I just was confirming my (inaudible). <br /> <br />CHR. NAMAHOE: All right. So, to make that presentation, I mean, we discussed one key <br />element. But that’s—is there any other elements that should be entertained or brought up? <br /> <br />MR. CHILLINGWORTH: When you say “elements” are you talking about in addition to the <br />fact that we think that the position should be bumped up to a position on a parity with <br />corporation counsel? <br /> <br />CHR. NAMAHOE: Correct. Outside of that—no? <br /> <br />MR. CHILLINGWORTH: I don’t have anything else beyond that. <br /> <br />MR. TAM: No. <br /> <br />CHR. NAMAHOE: Okay. So, then, we do agree that the presentation for the Salary <br />th <br />Commission will occur on May 16—and I’ll look at my schedule to attend it. And that the <br />focus of it will be to present to the Salary Commission that we believe the HR director—the <br />County HR director should be on parity with the director of corporation counsel, given the duties <br />of this department. <br />Page 16 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.