Laserfiche WebLink
Merit Appeals Board April 24, 2019 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MS. YAMADA: Yeah, you used that term. So, you wanted it on a future agenda to discuss <br />those type of questions? <br /> <br />CHR. NAMAHOE: So, that the employees can also—all right, so 360 evaluation—right. Okay. <br /> <br />MS. YAMADA: And then, on the message to all the department heads, there was discussion <br />that you wanted it only to department heads and to delete “program administrators” and “HR <br />representatives”—so I just wanted to confirm— <br /> <br />MR. CHILLINGWORTH: Right. <br /> <br />MS. YAMADA: —do only to HR (sic.) directors? <br /> <br />CHR. NAMAHOE: Okay. So, right now, the decisions to make—with respect to this section of <br />the agenda—executive and timeline. Okay, so we have the merit—we have the MAB meeting <br />set, the survey is set to go out, questions remain “as is”— <br /> <br />So, is there any possible amendments to the survey questions and/or evaluation form that we <br />choose to do? <br /> <br />MS. YAMADA: It was decided at the last meeting that it would be kept “as is.” <br /> <br />CHR. NAMAHOE: Okay, I’m just reading this right here. <br /> <br />MS. YAMADA: Oh. <br /> <br />CHR. NAMAHOE: Just to see— <br /> <br />MS. YAMADA: Okay. <br /> <br />CHR. NAMAHOE: —there’s nothing to add ‘cause we decided already that it’s “as is.” So— <br />execution and timeline for the evaluation—I’m trying to see what’s the unfinished part of the <br />business. <br /> <br />MS. YAMADA: Oh, just to confirm that these dates—target dates, are okay with you folks? <br />May 17 to send out the survey, and then the deadline for them to respond would be by May <br />st <br />31—and that we’ll be sending the survey only to department heads and not their <br />representatives/HR reps./assistants. <br /> <br />CHR. NAMAHOE: So, basically, no changes. <br /> <br />MR. TAM: No changes. <br /> <br />CHR. NAMAHOE: No changes. We’re on schedule. Gentlemen, concerns? <br />Page 18 <br /> <br /> <br />