My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2019-10-09 Regular Session Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2019
>
2019-10-09 Regular Session Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/11/2020 4:10:13 PM
Creation date
1/6/2020 4:07:48 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
who would...give preferential treatment to me over anybody <br /> else...just because I worked there previously. <br /> Mr. Wiseman: Thank you. <br /> Mr. Robinson: So these four contracts that are listed...are you saying that you're <br /> not gonna work on number iii? <br /> Mr. Bailey: I would say my...I mean...I would think my involvement would <br /> be very limited...if I had free availability to work on it. I mean if <br /> the ruling of the Board is that I should not...then I just won't be <br /> involved with it at all. But even if I were given the...you <br /> know...even if there wasn't a conflict or a problem that you could <br /> see. I don't think that I would really be heavily involved. It would <br /> be very, very minimal. <br /> Mr. Robinson: I just remembered, I forgot to ask you one thing important before <br /> we started. Do you want an open or a closed hearing? <br /> Mr. Bailey: Oh. Open is fine. <br /> Mr. Robinson: Sorry about that. <br /> Mr. Bailey: That's okay. I think the other thing that I'd like to mention <br /> is...we're talking about these four contracts. But also on the next <br /> page, you know there's up and coming work. So I wanted to also <br /> mention that item f. general staff augmentation support services, <br /> our company just recently was awarded the contract for that work. <br /> Maybe a couple of weeks ago. So that original request for <br /> proposal was issued on August 7, so I had already been at the <br /> company for about two months. Yeah...at that point. So that's <br /> another thing...another item that I'd like some feedback on. <br /> Mr. Robinson: Were you aware that that was an upcoming contract that your <br /> company would be pending on it...when you were employed at the <br /> County? <br /> Mr. Bailey: I knew that they were seeking some type of staff augmentation. I <br /> wasn't sure at that point, who were request for proposal was gonna <br /> go out to. I knew that it was probably gonna be Kennedy Jenks <br /> and the other companies. <br /> Mr. Robinson: Staff augmentation meaning? <br /> 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.