Laserfiche WebLink
Smith: Just to follow up on some of the other thoughts from Mr. Mukai, you understand the <br /> rules, you understand the gravity of the rules, you understand why the rules are in place, and <br /> you understand why the Department has these sting operations to ensure compliance. If you <br /> look at our agenda, there's five situations that are here where there was non-compliance. There <br /> needs to be consequences for not following the rules. As you admitted, this is not the first <br /> infraction of your business, and as you mentioned, the community of Keaukaha really <br /> appreciates the services your company provides because you're not just selling alcohol and <br /> tobacco, but food and everything else. I sympathize with everything you're doing, appreciate <br /> everything you've done in the community, but by the same token, I think there needs to be <br /> consequences for non-compliance. Okay? <br /> Sumera-Lee: I agree. <br /> Smith: So, we'll get to it. <br /> Giffin: Mr. Gonzalez? <br /> Gonzalez: Thank you, Ms. Chair, Brandon Gonzalez, Administrative Officer. We have five <br /> cases on the agenda today. They all deal with sales to minors, done as an administrative <br /> compliance check by the Department. The Police Department was not involved. That is why <br /> there are no criminal cases involved. It's all administrative. Because we have five similar cases, <br /> if you'd give me the next few minutes to explain the compliance checks and what we did so that <br /> you will have a better framework of what occurred. <br /> Giffin: Thank you. <br /> Gonzalez: The stories and the narratives that we hear today, will all be relevant. We had minor <br /> decoys under the age of 21 go in and attempt to purchase alcohol from various establishments <br /> on June 20, 2019. We checked 32 licensed establishments. Of the 32 establishments, 5 sold <br /> liquor to minors. Of the 5 that sold, the Director said at least half, so of the 5 that sold, 2 did not <br /> check IDs at all. They just sold. That left 3 that checked IDs. The 3 that checked IDs explained <br /> it as follows: <br /> • One said they misread the date of birth <br /> • One said they mistook the date of birth and input into the register <br /> 1998 instead of 1999 <br /> • And one Licensee said they miscalculated and added the date of <br /> birth wrong. <br /> Gonzalez: Our decoys are instructed, if they're asked for the ID, to present their State of <br /> Hawaii ID. I have prepared for you their IDs and what it looks like. For Keaukaha General <br /> Store, Decoy #2 was in the store. I have a paper colored version and the other is in black and <br /> white. As it was discussed earlier by Member Taniguchi, at the very top, besides it being <br /> oriented vertically indicating that it's for a minor, says 21st and on what date they turn 21. Under <br /> that, it says 18 and exactly what date they turn 18. <br /> Gonzalez: The part that was tricky, like the Licensee described, is the human input error. But <br /> that excuse has come up for years, which is why the licenses have evolved to the point where <br /> SEPTEMBER 5, 2019-LIQUOR ADJUDICATION BOARD MINUTES 8 <br />