Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Heintz: I have a question about that. Do we know? What agency is <br /> addressing this? <br /> Ms. Hall: Well, all I have is the information that's in these letters. I don't <br /> have any further information. <br /> Mr. Wiseman: And if it's a workplace incident. I mean. There's recourse in the <br /> workplace. <br /> Ms. Hall: Yes. <br /> Mr. Robinson: But it doesn't have a date or a time. <br /> Mr. Wiseman: No. <br /> Mr. Robinson: It just...outside of couple of months ago. <br /> Mr. Wiseman: Yeah. <br /> Mr. Robinson: So it's really... <br /> Ms. Sumner-Mack: And there's no way to reply. Because we don't know who...who <br /> sent it. <br /> Mr. Wiseman: So I move we just...we just file it. It's acknowledged and we just <br /> file it. No action. <br /> Mr. Robinson: Is there a second? <br /> Mr. Heintz: I have a question. <br /> Mr. Robinson: Okay. Well. let me get a second before we... <br /> Ms. Hall: And then you can discuss. <br /> Mr. Robinson: And then we can discuss. <br /> Ms. Sumner-Mack: Second. <br /> Mr. Robinson: Okay so moved and seconded. Any further discussion. Larry? <br /> Mr. Heintz: I'm gonna vote against this motion and here's the reason. When <br /> we have our two letters that are raising an issue that's...of <br /> professional misconduct...and that's why one...and against the <br /> police officer...apparently, allegedly...by a police officer against <br /> an employee. We don't know who's raising this issue but...I mean <br /> 5 <br />