Laserfiche WebLink
WIRICK: Yes, my name is Ric Wirick. I live in Orchidland Estates just across the highway <br />from HPP. First of all, I do have a question for the Commission. Is this meeting today to <br />approve the tower going in or just to approve the road access to the tower going in? <br />CLARKSON: It's to approve the time extension required for completion with all of the <br />conditions that were added to protect endangered species and with the new road access. The <br />tower itself is not up for consideration today. That's my understanding. Somebody correct me if <br />I'm wrong. <br />AGUINALDO: That's correct. <br />WIRICK: Okay, because I believe, you know, most of us that are here are here because the <br />public health and welfare, safety issue created by the tower. And, so, I guess what would be best <br />for us, especially us that are here, is how do we get our testimony in demanding actually that the <br />County take the time to do the necessary studies around existing towers to show the community <br />that this is a safe structure to put up? Now, there have been studies going on for over a decade in <br />Europe. They were showing up to 70 percent of the people that live around within a half mile of <br />these radiuses are being adversely affected, including the raise of cancer in individuals and that, <br />so I'm just asking at this particular point, how do we go through the process to have every one of <br />these towers looked at before they go in and make sure that the public safety hazard that it does <br />create is addressed because there will be in time class action lawsuits going against the County <br />for approving these things and the companies for installing these things. I mean, if we look at <br />the scientific data that they presented to us today, if you remember, back in the 1950's we had <br />doctors recommending Camel cigarettes to their patient with the AMA backing them. Today, we <br />laugh at that. I'm telling you, that took 50 years to come around the corner. We're looking now <br />at a risk that is involving safety of individuals and to allow these towers to go up around homes, <br />schools, and also churches is, you know, verging on, you know, a form of insanity. We have to <br />be able to move forward with this addressing the public safety issue in a realistic term looking at <br />studies that have already been done in Europe, having countries already stop this. Like Belgium <br />stopping any installation of new 5G towers and that how do we as a community stand up to <br />protect ourselves before this hazard is put in place? <br />CLARKSON: To answer your question to the best of my ability, and I'll invite other <br />Commissioners to speak to this issue, too, my suggestion is that you contact your Federal elected <br />representatives, and I'll tell you why. There is a Federal law that prohibits any local jurisdiction <br />from even considering the health effects of radiofrequency emissions in the consideration of <br />siting telecom facilities. So, you all are very welcome to make your views known, but we as a <br />local jurisdiction, the Planning Commission and the County, cannot consider any health effects <br />of radiowaves in making our decision. So, if you think that that's wrong, Federal law needs to <br />be changed, and the only way to do that is to get a representative before Congress to introduce <br />those changes. <br />COUCH: That's 4G to 5G is in your power to say no, too, because they didn't apply for it. <br />Well, just pointing it out. <br />EXHIBIT A <br />10 <br />