My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020-01-08 Exh A Hearing Transcript Cellco Partnership dba Verizon Amend USE 15-056
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2020
>
2020-01-08 Exh A Hearing Transcript Cellco Partnership dba Verizon Amend USE 15-056
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/7/2020 3:15:10 PM
Creation date
2/7/2020 3:14:58 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CLARKSON: Please introduce yourselves and tell us where you reside, who you represent, and <br />proceed with your comments about the application. <br />MARTIN: Okay, great. My name is Danette Martin. I'm a consultant to Verizon Wireless, and <br />I live in Kailua-Kona. <br />GRODZIN: My name is Noah Grodzin. I'm the real estate manager for Verizon in the State of <br />Hawaii, and I reside in Mililani, Oahu. <br />MARTIN: Okay, so let me give you a little bit background on this. I came on this project after <br />the permit was received in 2015, and at that time, the owner had not signed the lease agreement <br />prior to getting the permit here. So, my job was to finish things up. And, so, I contacted the <br />pastor who was new to this church, Dr.—or Pastor Ray, Raymond Seamon, and he was new to <br />the project as well. And, so we went through the plans with him and he had mentioned that they <br />had newly acquired this property in the back and that he requested that we change the access for <br />that. <br />So, we did sign an agreement with him with the revised access and then we had to go through the <br />NEPA process and that takes some time to do to make sure that they consult with the different <br />agencies and things like that including Fish & Wildlife. So, we're coming back now after we <br />were able to update that requesting this change. <br />I did read the, some of the testimony, the opposing testimony, and unfortunately, I wasn't able to <br />get a radio frequency engineer here, because that's always helpful in talking to the community to <br />explain to them why it's safe and why it's not harmful. And, so, if you don't mind, I would like <br />to just read a little bit of information that I've received from the FCC about this. <br />So, "In 1996, the FCC adopted updated guidelines for evaluating human exposure to RF fields <br />from fixed transmitting antennas such as those used for cellular and PCS cell sites. The [FCC's] <br />guidelines are identical to those recommend by the National Council on Radiation Protection and <br />Measures [Measurements], a non-profit corporation chartered by Congress to develop <br />information and recommendations concerning radiation protection. The FCC's guidelines also <br />resemble the 1992 guidelines recommended by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics <br />Engineers, a non-profit technical professional engineering society, and endorsed by the <br />American National Standards Institute" and ANSI "a non-profit, privately -funded membership <br />organization that coordinates development of voluntary national standards in the United States. <br />In the case of a cellular and PCS cell site transmitters, the FCC's RF exposure guidelines <br />recommend a maximum permissible exposure level to the general public of approximately 580 <br />microwatts per square centimeter. This limit is many times greater than RF levels typically <br />found at [near] the base of cellular or PCS cell site towers or in the vicinity of other, low <br />[lower-] powered cell site transmitters. <br />Calculations corresponding to a "worst-case" situation (all transmitters operating simultaneously <br />and continuously at the maximum licensed power) show that, in order to be exposed to RF levels <br />near the FCC's guidelines, and individual would essentially have to remain in the main stream <br />EXHIBIT A <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.