Laserfiche WebLink
CLARKSON: So, there, there wouldn't be any—if nobody is using that except the people that <br />own that parcel, Kilauea Lodge people, there wouldn't be any prescriptive problems or anything. <br />The road could be moved over although it looks like a shame to move the road over into all those <br />plants, but. <br />KAY: So, again, if you look at the proposed site plan, they are shifting theso, the current <br />access is generally in this area. They are going to be shifting the proposed access a little bit <br />farther toward the existing Kilauea Lodge, so there's a truck turnaround and loading here and <br />then keeping outside of that 12 -foot setback. So, aside from maybe removing the rock wall <br />that's fronting the existing 12 -foot roadway easement, there shouldn't be any impedance here, as <br />is currently proposed. <br />CLARKSON: Yeah, okay, I just think it's a shame that you got a road— <br />KAY: —Yeah. <br />CLARKSON: You're gonna have two roads right next to each other, and <br />KAY: I understand— <br />CLARKSON: —you can't just have one road be used by <br />KAY: —Yeah, so <br />CLARKSON: two parties <br />KAY: So, so as it has to do with where the easement is currently placed should they work <br />with the other landowner to change the location of that easement, they could do so. But, as it is <br />right now, that's, that's what we saw when that easement was there, currently blocked, but we <br />can't allow it to be blocked. <br />CLARKSON: Well, so here's my question. <br />KAY: Yeah? <br />CLARKSON: Then, if they did make an agreement with the parcel behind to use the new <br />presumably paved or improved road, what about your condition that they remove the rock wall? <br />Would that prohibit <br />KAY: I don't know that the <br />CLARKSON: them from moving over to the new, a new easement? <br />KAY: I think the condition reads— <br />EXHIBIT B <br />4 <br />