Laserfiche WebLink
` 8 Federal Register / Val. 54, Na. 40 <br /> J Thursday, Manch <br /> • 1989 / Rules and Regulations <br /> - 1 the Agency's determination <br /> .1 the person's application or claim. federet .a,5,projects,V <br /> applicabilitydefined at ?.4 <br /> z Section application <br /> "to thegreotest extentinvolvement <br /> •If Federal <br /> • review appeal. Agency official to practicable under State law" em loanfrom <br /> non-Federal-solely the ices,for of <br /> Several comments were (emphasis loan s <br /> i <br /> received about agency appeal processes, thatsupplied), <br /> !which la the same wordingsources,for <br /> 0 Ito the levels of review, ppsection 905 a example,the Uniform Act 4 not <br /> and the official Uniform Act ( )of the applicable. <br /> il! conductinglsthe and whether from the mean an agency��A interprets this to If an Individual a <br /> ` F oafficer.or another appropriate bearing compliancis legally <br /> must comply If as a voluntary acquisition qualifies <br /> eg y possible under transaction under <br /> The appeal process fa an entirelyState law.This should be taken into i M•101( Subpart B <br /> internal account in an agency's assurances do not apply.This mayb requirements <br /> tf <br /> process of an agency.The pursuant to 1 24.4(a). non-site important for <br /> r decisions by the agency about the specific acquisitions. <br /> process must only conform to these Utility companies as acquiring <br /> It was elated in a co <br /> regulations and whatever otheroagencies.—When the condition of comment that a <br /> the Uniform Act,It Cargrese amended membership in a <br /> ` administrative rules which the definition of"Staff changed the cooperative may include as obligation <br /> rule,menden must the �` son who has the authority to Provision hes been adder In L way <br /> his or her rightsto advise person of acquire property by eminent domain 124.101(a)(2)to <br /> aftero a <br /> administrative seek <br /> hearing review Un State law."Utility companies are d donet�0�that SubpartB <br /> �rawted, oat common example non- trlbution of real amply if the <br /> Having considered the gouanmentai entities which are granted cooperative is made by a��,to <br /> FiIWA has el comureata eminent domain authority.The effect of meet the <br /> act to retain 24.10 as this changewas,for thereq meat of membership <br /> written. first tfnse,to egroameAts,contracts or bylaws.FHWA <br /> Subpart B--Real p bring utility companies under Uniform believes that such cases,where <br /> Ply Aaquiaftion Act coverage for certain of their members of cooperatives have agreed to <br /> Z!t01 pro jells' <br /> Section�u24 Applicability of Sixteen comments Were submitted as necessaryvide ewe!�a`0 cooperative <br /> Requirements or en behalf of utility es. to advance the common <br /> Section Z!r0r(oJ. a n'�eetLrg the viewsMerest of the members.are similar to <br /> number n comments Thereon were section <br /> many h+mdneds of individual concerns of voluntary <br /> transactionsl or farather than to <br /> which addresses the applicability of their asaodations, perativea, acquisition. or federilll funded <br /> Subpart B and Title III of the Uniform and laws Almost all of these <br /> Act.Most of the comments expressed a concern the possibleImps the Smote regulation appears to useless <br /> COMMith limited scope of �B of these regolatiana upon which we op �,domsta law ander <br /> conoen on,and severalrequested that rural cooperatives that may <br /> s Appendixin A criteria found reoet�Federalfinancial assistance <br /> d='Both serer�5 of the Uniform <br /> a. f om die Rare!Electrification <br /> Act and; ii1(c)of tics part make It <br /> A interim final rule be included. <br /> u, Administration ) dear that the real <br /> property 1?HWA has substantially revised this cultnra(USDA).In the Department policies in me Act <br /> based on the eommeato. section of the preamble is Subpart B of this part are applicable"to <br /> section devoted to the comments and concerns the greatest extent ctt t w under <br /> Voluntary transaction criteria have been of those totitfes.FHWA believes that <br /> e <br /> included.and a actio orion has been State laver'.Thla <br /> added exempting coverage certain compliance with the Uniform Act and COm anco i+1e9 +ad fit Ie sot <br /> real iransa from co crag re these regulations will not be as prohibited by State law,these <br /> cooperatives propertyand their ns betweene dome as some of the commenters Previsions do not requiremecedents.or overrule <br /> of Federal Fir mem resistance perceive it to be.In addition,as Cc State law r lity companies <br /> is presencethe basic determinant financial <br /> for discussed further below,one suggestion, Accordingly.utility withtpheies must <br /> applicability,with exceptions provided exempting from coverage certain continue to eompfy the <br /> for those acquisitions exceptions <br /> tsansactlons between cooperatives and requirements of State eminent domain <br /> f 24.101(x)(1}.(4), their members,has been adopted. law.Section 24.4(x)of this <br /> Eminent domain authority is not a Following are the substantive Issues addressee the ! <br /> art <br /> determining factor au horst; sraised in the comments,with an PHWA that must be submit s a envy of compliancene <br /> any acquisition madey under the although reply. tie action)a the Federales e a one- <br /> determining <br /> domain is threat of he rule should be amended so ft providin8 mal <br /> Subpart B clearly subject to would not a_ pply to electric ca a8 B Baa <br /> requirements because such an a Guth iity exceptions <br /> tt(c)addresaea the matter of <br /> acquisition cannot be a voluntary � ly' A does not have authority excaptiaas to Subpart B provisions <br /> t transactionhoexempt any entity or group of entities because of provisions of State law. <br /> r Essential to the voluntary transaction an1e•Harr►ever.ns described A utility company a wish to <br /> process hr some detail lat r,the <br /> is the requirement that the re8alafonassi the ce In Fre aria its its State <br /> owner must be intentionally provide much latitude and for assistance hi <br /> the property i not ba ec9�dng that may <br /> =a particular objective assurances in those on"where the <br /> amicable agreement can be reached. 2.Y would appear that all of our to botheminent Slats domain law app$ss <br /> However,even though an ecgaldtiorr <br /> Hoy be e,even as avoluntaryacgtd project,and acqulsftions are covered by Utility highway T and they <br /> may et ex aged sa mchoose tothe fin. company.The State highway <br /> fallow the Subpart g Re There are certain conditions � �d know dEn ever dthe <br /> Process. that must be0e°aafence seed to ba <br /> Sact�iorr KW:(fiJaad[c�Certain __ present before a utility gmtlif)ed because of Slate law. <br /> clarifications have been made In thew requirements.Maul with Subpart>! t Wes d 1 { <br /> port <br /> aecIions,The change Inc fid. must be P financial r as I than d atthe an l sated <br /> !Anna=Hated <br />