Laserfiche WebLink
11 Federal es / Vol..54. No. 40 / Thursday. March Z 1989 / Rules and R ' <br /> trtlatfoira i <br /> property.This may be appropriate is made directly to the <br /> areas where mobile homes are treated governor's designee,g�ernor,or the• recognition of a possible iaConaia <br /> as real property under the optionte ior The governor.or a State office or between the requirements of I 2tentry <br /> where an agency has to agency designated by the and the assurances �1< <br /> i consider mobile homes to be either real be able to standardise the governor.will and sections 210 and required 2otheI <br /> r property personal developprocess and Act.eAsd a consequence,r o,de <br /> F � property.However. an expertise la the <br /> � some State awe consider moa homes oft# processing revised and clarified to [b9� <br /> to be persona/ roe PPhretions.Further.the governor or State agency under <br /> that lawif a <br /> 1 therefore. they property <br /> rty only,and. <br /> d. his or her designee will be more able toregulation,certifies. State <br /> realty. ma not be acquired as assess the capabilities of those State and��epmvIa it can and trill comply <br /> agencies seekingprovisions of the coveredrm Act <br /> to nonuse Federal which would otherwise be <br /> Subpart G--Certification <br /> by <br /> agency reepaasibiiities through the <br /> This subpart p agency <br /> certificationcyreprocess.A focal point of the sections 210 and 305 assurances <br /> I. F implements one of the this nature will be particularlthea,fails to old Federald,the na ce ulna e�d <br /> most significant changes added by the advantageous is processing should withhold gene ciao �' <br /> 1987 Amendments.As such,PHWA has certification'frona State agency programs, <br /> r grams, r that.end aceacyy <br /> I a special interest in its implemented= seeking certification approval from more � 'Pmkda.Uniform activities <br /> and would appreciate receiving further than one Federal agency, affected ti the procAct <br /> information on its use and effectiveness. Two commenters indicated seta process does not <br /> Subpart Several respondents commented on misunderstandinrg of the respoasibflidea diminish le agency fundamental <br /> i G.however as stapled of the Federal funding agency. �poasibi$tlas tegardirg c�Rhalrce <br /> or group of comments,was sufficiently fun is not intended that the Federal prtheovisions <br /> Uniform Act;particularly sons those <br /> persuasivethe to necessitate a change ding aganc1 endorse an approved end 305 as referred to the dear. <br /> 210 <br /> proposed text.However.one application received from the governor, sad 3e. assurances.It compliance clear.freta the <br /> Comment on II 24.603.Monitoring acrd or the governor'.designee,if the Federal whiute,teat ejectf witheasauraceprovisions <br /> t Corrective adios.did draw our attention fila has appropriate o the imp t the to the Aces <br /> to the need for a substantive revision of program P importance to the <br /> j- <br /> deficiencies <br /> continued Federal financial-assistance <br /> Section N.6PLt$ Ce�rjSa�'Qe 5ta>�ede ai •The purpose af�the of program.projects.and activities <br /> APP ane �B agency accept the affected by the IflJnlUniform Act, <br /> approved application without F�°maple.if Uniform Ad non_ <br /> Two, certification applicationa be made <br /> commenters recommended that <br /> performing an independent review is occurred in connection with <br /> threefold:trodirectly from the head of t,ft e ofa psrof ed the Federal <br /> the State mar•or governor's esig designee. Zang Mild it.authority la <br /> Ire evaluating <br /> financial assistance,ra�thsa focus ft+diff Into w gge4 li the <br /> me &goveraoc,or the governor's fCwt sterna of the F >e° is oa�ltaaca nth the <br /> A does not adopt this ��c'2''s oversight of its State cartificatiaa. <br /> res desighee. aHmet,There!'adopt t to agencie ,third,unless there are pre- In order to ensure coordination of <br /> need for a food tic point within each State did appropriate lydfcat sad information amimg Federal agendas <br /> or the and point <br /> within <br /> of deficiencies,the certificetloo approval that may have accepted a Cartificetioo <br /> fcertification receiptand screening <br /> creeapplications.Consistencan t tionaiy.The from the same state agency'language <br /> certi the principles of fConcis,the second ted three foregoing points is has been added to 1 24603 <br /> Office of the Governor,as the Chief the basis for the smitt <br /> cap a assessment of require that the lead agency bei�c�to <br /> Officer is or, state,is the the States cape tides to consulted by the Federal <br /> Executivelc thecal me point for this process,is thgm ederal fund cartillcation which the before any Federal funds are withheld <br /> since <br /> Over exercises State when the t r cation applicamust tion is acceptancevide certifiedof a stats certificationKinney or the <br /> agencies that are authority Over the S Federal transmitted to the Federal lead agency. et—A1a revoked. <br /> financial assistance or through Appendix A to Flet 24—Addiliea,at <br /> Federalwhich Section .6�A4 Monitor and Information <br /> Handal assistance is Corrective action <br /> channelled to sub-recipients at the local �0 appendix has been modified and <br /> level.all of whom are subjectOne respondent objected to the <br /> augmented taprovlde for better <br /> lvel, Act and any of whom could permissive withholding of Federal understanding°h the penal s. the <br /> Uniformmake Ac a for certification agency <br /> assistance if a certified State regulations to which R pertains. <br /> approval.The certification process does State 1a to comply with applicable Section 2!.218X21 <br /> not alter the existing g rale and regulation serving as the l ersons not dirpjocad-p eo4 has <br /> between �ret:elati the basis of its certification,The respondent been added to the first semeace to dazify <br /> State-level v local reap of Bournral perceived this to mean that the authority that son's persons maybe temporarily <br /> displacefinancial asalataaCa.hiswithholdto approval of Federal because they teat mew not beenoed rteo <br /> any certificationassistapplication <br /> that financial assistance is available to any _displacedbecause have permanently <br /> plication made by Federal <br /> State l <br /> sub-recipient <br /> will be made through a of financial mess of the source ' <br /> the <br /> State <br /> level a governorsee. governor.the orn those andIs not the authority Section <br /> anneal�nse to several <br /> instances where the local level agency withholding fFed ley regarding the modifier. <br /> ab concerning short-term rent.the <br /> [city,county,etc.}is the directof Federal eachfinancial >AodlBer.~geneniil�has bean added to the <br /> and there is no Stara-level t. assistance renis with Federal last sentence. <br /> the oauthorized to p pooh amend acctivities.ncy • l4 respondent's U4 seczadpayors <br /> �t�lsou d be comment did,however,lead us to the snowing hes b� <br />