2020-01-16 Leeward Exh A (REZ 19-236)

Home

CARR SMITH: Yes, I have a couple of questions about the conditions, please. KAY: Okay. CARR SMITH: Condition F, like Frank, it reads that"Restrictive covenants in the deeds of all the proposed lots within the subject property shall give notice that the terms of the zoning ordinance prohibit the construction of a second dwelling unit and CPR [condominium property regimes] on each lot." My question is the next statement, "This restriction may be removed by amendment of this ordinance by the County Council." So I'm trying to understand why that would be put in there, if it can be removed. KAY: So, this is a standard condition language that we put in for most of our Agricultural rezonings, and because this is just a recommendation to the County Council, they have the ability to remove it, or if the applicant wished to amend it, should the ordinance be approved with this condition in place, they have the opportunity to do so. Again, it's just a standard language that we use. CARR SMITH: Okay, thank youI'm sorry I don't remember that. I had one more, M, like Mary, having to do with regional impacts, so, obviously, the Kaloko Drive at Mamalahoa is a tough spot there. And it's said in here that Department of Transportation is not willing to pay for any improvements in that. So I was just wondering, it says, "shall be in the form of cash and/or in-kind services approved by the County Council and shall be applied to improving the Kaloko Drive/Mamalahoa Highway intersection." I'm just curious. Is there like a special fund for that when people's fair share comes in for that area, or how is that handled? KAY: Yes, my understanding is that there is a separate fund that, the fund specifically for this intersection, these intersections where improvements are put into, once the fair share is paid. I believe we are up to about 650,000 dollars in the fund, and that's, you know, something that we are still, still working on how to best apply those funds to make those improvements. So we are working with the State, working with Public Works, and trying to work that out. CARR SMITH: Thank you. That's all I have. KAY: Okay. UNGER: Any other questions? Commissioner Vitousek. VITOUSEK: Yes, sir. Questions regarding the historic preservation review. So, I see in the information that the parcel is within the boundaries of the Kona Field System, but that there has been no archaeological inventory survey done to date. I see in the Page 6 of the Recommendation that"the Planning Director recommends a condition requiring an archaeological reconnaissance survey for the property to identify resources and to implement mitigation if[resources are] found...." I just point out that the historic preservation review process is a six-step process, beginning with identification and ending with verification of completion of detail mitigation measures. And the review process isn't over until either there is 3 EXHIBIT A