Laserfiche WebLink
DARROW: No,there is an existing SMA that has not been revoked. <br /> UNGER: And we just approved an SMA, another SMA. <br /> DARROW: You approved it, but it's effective, it becomes effective upon the approval of the <br /> rezone. So it's not effective yet. So the concern is that if the rezone does not get approved, then <br /> no SMAS on the property, yeah. And so, yesterday I was in Kona, so I wasn't available but there <br /> was discussion, and I thought that there was going to be a condition added to the revocation <br /> saying that it would become effective upon the approval of the rezone. <br /> HALL: Is that what the applicant desires? <br /> VITOUSEK: Can we do that now? <br /> DARROW: That's the question is <br /> HALL: I just, I don't understand what's <br /> DARROW: If the applicant is willing to let go of the old SMA and not worry about the future, <br /> then <br /> LINGER: No <br /> MOOERS: The old SMA has never been perfected anyway and it's for a project that we don't <br /> propose to build. My letter requesting revocation did not say it was contingent upon the <br /> rezoning. It's just a revocation, because in effect that that SMA may exist on paper, but has <br /> never been complied with, and we have no intention of building that project. <br /> UNGER: Okay, all right, well, there you go,that's clarification. I think there is a motion on the <br /> table right now. <br /> HALL: Thank you. <br /> UNGER: Yeah, thank you. <br /> ROY: There is a motion. <br /> UNGER: There is a motion to revoke the current SMA Permit. If there is no other discussions, <br /> then roll call. <br /> ROY: Commissioner Carr Smith? <br /> CARR SMITH: Aye. <br /> ROY: Commissioner Kealoha? <br /> 26 <br /> EXHIBIT B <br />