My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020-02-06 Exh A PD Initiated Vincent Tai REZ 13-167
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2020
>
2020-02-06 Exh A PD Initiated Vincent Tai REZ 13-167
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2020 9:45:50 AM
Creation date
3/6/2020 9:45:35 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
REPLOGLE: Thank you. I would like to just say that the eight- to ten -foot piles of branches <br />and rubbish will eventually present another threat, and that's fire. <br />RAFFIPIY: Thank you very much. You may take your seat. Is there anybody in the audience <br />that would like to testify on this item? If none, I need a motion to close public testimony. <br />REPLOGLE: I move that we close public testimony. <br />CLARKSON: Second. <br />RAFFIPIY: It's been moved and seconded that we close public testimony. All in favor? <br />COMMISSIONERS: Aye. <br />RAFFIPIY: Any opposed, nay? Motion carried. Now, I need a motion for action on this item. <br />REPLOGLE: I move that we have a favorable recommendation to the Planning Director's <br />initiated Vincent Tai REZ 13-[0]00167 be adopted. <br />RAFFIPIY: Any second? <br />CLARKSON: I'll second. <br />RAFFIPIY: It's been moved and seconded that this item be a favorable recommendation. All <br />those in favor say "aye?" <br />COMMISSIONERS: Aye. <br />RAFFIPIY: Oh, excuse me. Any discussion on this matter at this time. <br />CLARKSON: Yes, I'd like to explain my second. <br />RAFFIPIY: Go ahead. <br />CLARKSON: But, I'll defer to my, Mr. Replogle if you wish to go first. <br />REPLOGLE: No, please do. <br />CLARKSON: My reason for recommending that the County Council revisit this is that <br />apparently there has been significant change in financial circumstances all around and that the <br />Planning Director who has been intimately involved with this believes that the original zoning or <br />at least as it exists now is a mistake, and I'd like to give the County Council a chance to revisit <br />that and if they choose to maintain the existing zoning, put additional conditions on it that would <br />hopefully make Mr. Tai or whoever succeeds him do a good job in developing the property. <br />REPLOGLE: I would <br />EXHIBIT A <br />24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.