My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020-02-06 Exh F Vladimir & Nadezhda Zosim SPP 19-208
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2020
>
2020-02-06 Exh F Vladimir & Nadezhda Zosim SPP 19-208
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2020 9:52:50 AM
Creation date
3/6/2020 9:52:48 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning map shows that the property outlined in red there is A-1 a, one acre. Across the highway <br />is A -3a, and commercial zoning here. The State Land Use boundary, State Land Use shows that <br />it's Agricultural and there's two Urban sites nearby. The LUPAG map shows that it's Rural. <br />There's Urban Expansion and Extensive Agricultural across the highway. <br />This is the Applicant's proposed site plan. You can see the, the proposed structure in the center <br />there, proposed parking, driveway, water catchment, the turn -around, and Lotus Blossom Lane <br />on the left. Aerial photographs show the proximity to the highway and to the existing <br />commercial retail spaces there. It's on Lotus Blossom Lane so the access drive would be right <br />from here. Property outlined in blue. This is the, the view of the subject property from Lotus <br />Blossom Lane, so that's the subject property looking up on the left and on the right, kind of an <br />alternate view. And, this is looking southeast on Lotus Blossom Lane looking northwest on <br />Lotus Blossom Lane. Planning Director's recommendation is approval with conditions. <br />RAFFIPIY: Thank you, Jessica. Do we have any questions from the Commission for the staff? <br />CLARKSON: I hate to ask this question in the interest of time, but I'm just curious. Quickly, <br />why a residential senior care facility does not require any permit but having seniors during the <br />day does? <br />ANDREWS: So, the daycare is not a permitted use, and so that requires a Special Use Permit <br />whereas the other is a permitted use, as I said on the slide up to eight people, yeah. <br />RAFFIPIY: Thank you. Any other questions? Thank you, staff. Will the Applicant or <br />representative please come forward? Please raise your right hand. Do you swear or affirm to tell <br />the truth on this matter now before the Planning Commission? <br />MIKKELSON: I do. <br />RAFFIPIY: Thank you very much. You can go ahead ma'am. State your name, where you <br />reside, your association with the <br />CLARKSON: It's on. <br />MIKKELSON: Okay, thanks. <br />RAFFIPIY Project, and please speak directly in the microphone. Thank you. <br />MIKKELSON: My name is Lori Mikkelson. I live in Papa`aloa, Hawaii, and this is my friend <br />and client, Nadia, for simplicity, and she's been working with senior citizens for twenty years, so <br />that's the background, and her interests. I did work with the State to find out about the <br />permitting, and it's a dual permit. If, if they go on beyond the, in the future <br />RAFFIPIY: Could you please speak directly into the microphone. Thank you. <br />EXHIBIT F <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.