Laserfiche WebLink
spend considerable time searching for co -locations." Please consider that in the following. <br />Regarding co-locationed equipment, it is impossible to determine at this time if other carriers <br />will desire to collab, to co -locate equipment on the proposed tower, and it is not possible to <br />calculate needed space in anticipation of future undefined potential co -location tenants as their <br />number and cabinet space needs cannot be determined at this time. There's some slick bully <br />play for you. <br />If I sat on this Commission, I would see this statement as an insult to my intelligence before, as <br />an insult to my intelligence before AT&T built a hugely expensive two hundred foot tower, they <br />signed agreements with co -location tenants for lease of tower and cabinet space. This is standard <br />business procedure in business, whether one is building a tower or a shopping center, and <br />Mr. Tomlinson very clearly cooperated that. They would not commission such an investment <br />without commitments from tenants. In my estimation, this statement conveys disregard to for the <br />integrity of this esteemed panel and the intelligence of its constituents. This tower will be a <br />monstrosity, of bristling antennas and other hardware. It will not look anything like what you <br />saw on the photos, or the pictures that mock up, etcetera. <br />Next, proposed project details, subject property. It says, "The property is not in use for <br />agriculture." The property owner's a real estate speculator. He fenced the property and keeps a <br />few animals in the unmanaged pasture in order to avoid paying property taxes. From a legal and <br />tax standpoint, the property is being, is being used for agriculture. Undoubtedly, he also claims <br />income tax benefits from the sham farming operation. In fact, the pasture's dominated by weed <br />species that are toxic to livestock because he's never cared for it. Like most real estate <br />speculators in Hawaii, he is gaming the system. <br />Next, access and parking. The text says, "The access road is within the Property parcel and is <br />owned by Richard [and Yvette] Umiat." The access road in question is Iwasaki Camp Loop. <br />This is not Mr. Umiat's road, and it is not contained within his parcel. This road belongs to all <br />the properties and owners on the access road. Mr. Umait is not entitled to sell use of the road to <br />other entities without permission from all the owners. AT&T will be driving heavy equipment <br />on our privately maintained road. The road is already in poor condition. The heavy AT&T <br />construction traffic will make the road undriveable for the passenger cars that Iwasaki Camp <br />residents must use to access their homes. They don't have any options. <br />Next, project description, wireless facilities and equipment, ground equipment. The text states <br />that the tower infrastructure will include "50 -kW back-up generator that will power the facility in <br />case of emergency." Then in 2.3.1 they state, "The equipment associated with the facility will <br />operate virtually noise -free." I hope you all caught that. Apparently, in whatever rainbow <br />bubble the Applicant's live, they have access to virtually noise -free fifty kW diesel generators. <br />Perhaps they can order one of these for me while they're at it. And maybe a unicorn too. <br />Apparently escaped their awareness that power outages are routine in Puna. The emergencies of <br />which they speak are normal here. The neighborhood would have to endure the racket of this <br />generator at all hours of the day and night. Oops, no mine is not double -sided, yours is, sorry. <br />Next, AT&T network coverage and services, statement of objectives for proposed facility. The <br />text states, "...this new site will provide coverage to the immediate area." I have previously <br />EXHIBIT C <br />13 <br />