2020-02-06 Exh C New Cingular dba AT&T Mobility USE 19-081

Home

This shows the zoning map for the property and the surrounding properties. The subject property is zoned A -20a, Ag -20, 20 acres. And nearby properties are RS -20. Across the highway is RS -15 and Ag -la, and this is the highway here. The General Plan designation, called the LUPAG designation, is Low Density Urban, for the subject property and nearby is Urban Expansion. This is the Applicant's site plan, and it shows the property designated or outlined with the black line here to show the property boundaries. The site is shaded in gray, and the lease area for the, for the monopole tower and the lease area itself is outlined in red. On the left is the compound plan provided by the Applicant. On the right is the equipment plan provided by the Applicant. And, the compound plan shows the monopole sited here. This is the elevation view provided by the Applicant. Southwest on the left; northeast on the right. The aerial photo shows the site is undeveloped, and the neighboring, the neighboring neighborhood is here, and this is Kua`aina Road, and this is North Road. Upper left photo here shows the property, it's looking northwest across the property as viewed from the entry gate. On the right is a view of the entry gate itself from Kua`aina Road, and in this view, this is the entry gate here, this is the, the posted sign for the application, and this view on the bottom shows the property looking southeast from the entry gate. Photo on the left shows the road, Kua`aina Road that accesses the property. This is looking west— W. ELLWOOD (from audience): This is not Kua`aina Road. ANDREWS: —and looking on the right property, I'm sorry, on the right photo is looking south. W. ELLWOOD (from audience): This is not Kua`aina Road. CLARK: (from audience): There's a lot of lying, discrepancy here, throughout. It's wrong. ANDREWS: This is, these are coverage maps provided by the Applicant. This on the left is [the] existing coverage map, and on the right is the projected AT&T coverage map. The Applicant's analysis shows target coverage area has minimal to no service. According to the Applicant, the proposed antenna height is the minimum necessary to help fill the coverage gap relative to nearby complementary wireless facilities. The Applicant provided this in the application. This is a map showing alternative site locations that was part of the study. To clarify on this map, this red outline, as I understand it, shows the search area that AT&T used as the, the area where they wanted to provide coverage, and so the pin that's actually dropped here is not an existing tower, it just is the center of the search ring. You can see the two candidates that were alternative sites and then this is the proposed site. These maps show the coverage of alternate heights that were an analysis done by the Applicant -- one hundred four feet, one hundred fifty-four feet, one hundred seventy-nine feet. The Planning Director's recommendation is approval with conditions. That concludes my presentation. EXHIBIT C 2