My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020-02-06 Exh C New Cingular dba AT&T Mobility USE 19-081
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2020
>
2020-02-06 Exh C New Cingular dba AT&T Mobility USE 19-081
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2020 10:01:09 AM
Creation date
3/6/2020 10:00:55 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
difference between the two is that the second notification will have the date, time, and location of <br />the Planning Commission hearing. In this case, the Applicant submitted information that he sent <br />out two notifications. The first notification, which the letter is identified as being sent out on <br />December 2nd, and the second letter being identified as beingI don't, I cannot say it was sent <br />out on that date, it was dated December 2nd, and the second letter was dated January 15, 2020. <br />The Applicant would have to verify that on what day they sent that letter. Normally, when we <br />receive, there's several ways they can submit evidence of sending it out. One is through an <br />affidavit where they do a signed affidavit stating I sent out these mailings on this date. Okay, in <br />this particular case, he had an affidavit saying he sent it out, but it didn't say specifically what <br />day, but we did receive the first notification and the second notification in January. So, we'll <br />have to ask the Applicant specifically when he sent out, those dates. The other way that we <br />prefer is that you actually submit a notarized, I mean a certified list or certified mailings because <br />there's no question at that point, but the law allows them to submit an affidavit stating that they <br />did send it out. <br />AU: Okay, well thank you, and you know, just a comment for my fellow Commissioners. You <br />know, we trust our Planning Director and his staff to provide us whatever information we need, <br />and if it's not there and it's not true, then that's in question, but we are provided what we need to <br />know to make the decision. And you know, there's a lot of emotional testifiers, on various <br />applicants that we have, but we have to remember to vote on what the agendized item is. <br />DARROW: If I could just chime in real quick. It seems like a common issue that we run into all <br />the time when people say they weren't notified, it's because they are renters and not owners. So, <br />the only way that an applicant can notify surrounding property owners is through the information <br />provided on the Real Property Tax website, which is the owners or lessees of record. Renters <br />normally aren't listed on there as a lessee of record. <br />CLARKSON: I have one other question. There was an assertion made that the notification sign <br />that was shown in the photo has to be on a public road. <br />DARROW: That is correct. <br />CLARKSON: And what will the status of this application be since it's clear that the property, if <br />it's correct that the sign was put on the corner of the Umiats' property, it was not, therefore, put <br />on a public road. It was obviously their property that they put the sign on. <br />DARROW: I would agree with that, but that is the Commission's decision to make that call, as <br />far as what they want to do with that, but in this particular case it appears the sign was not placed <br />fronting a public road. <br />AU: I have another question. So, there was also a testimony saying, talking about Kam schools, <br />so did you get any correspondences from Kamehameha Schools on record? <br />DARROW: We did not. <br />AU: Okay. <br />EXHIBIT C <br />23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.