My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020-02-06 Exh D New Cingular dba AT&T Mobility USE 19-082
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2020
>
2020-02-06 Exh D New Cingular dba AT&T Mobility USE 19-082
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2020 10:03:15 AM
Creation date
3/6/2020 10:03:02 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
RAFFIPIY: So there's a motion on the floor. <br />C. SCHISZLER mom audience): [Inaudible] Where's the proof it was sent? <br />RAFFIPIY: There's a motion on the floor to close. <br />REPLOGLE: And I seconded. <br />RAFFIPIY: All those in favor to close testimony, public testimony say aye. <br />COMMISSIONERS: Aye. <br />RAFFIPIY: Opposed, nay. Public testimony is now closed. <br />CLARKSON: I still have one more question for staff. Are there any, you know, we get so many <br />cell towers applications here, and some of them recently have been in HPP. Are there any, to <br />your knowledge, other applications pending, or recently approved applications for which the cell <br />tower has not yet been built near this site? <br />JACKSON: I'm not aware of applications we haven't received yet, but there was a tower <br />application submitted by Cellco, which is Verizon, and that tower was near Railroad over on the <br />Shower Drive end of the subdivision, and that was <br />CLARKSON: Quite a ways away. <br />JACKSON: denied. That was denied. <br />DARROW: Malia, I think would be able to answer that. <br />HALL: I don't know what application you guys are talking about. <br />JACKSON: Okay. <br />HALL: But yes, there was a recent denial, and yes, the court upheld the recent denial. It was the <br />one with, if we're speaking about the same one, it was the one where basically the house was <br />within the falling radius of the tower. <br />JACKSON: Yeah. <br />RAFFIPIY: Any, any other comments? Can we poll the Commission please? Oh, can I get a <br />motion please? <br />HALL: For action. <br />RAFFIPIY: For action. <br />EXHIBIT D <br />18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.